The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Randomised comparison of fluorouracil, epidoxorubicin and methotrexate (FEMTX) plus supportive care with supportive care alone in patients with non-resectable gastric cancer
Open accessAbstract
A phase III randomised study, comparing treatment with fluorouracil, epidoxorubicin and methotrexate (FEMTX) with the best supportive care, was conducted in patients with unresectable or metastatic gastric cancer. During the period from July 1986 to June 1992, 41 patients were randomised to receive FEMTX or best supportive care. MTX was given in a dose of 1500 mg m-2 intravenously (i.v.) followed after 1 h by 5-FU 1500 mg m-2 i.v. on day 1; leucovorin rescue was started after 24 h (30 mg orally every 6 h for 48 h) and epidoxorubicin 60 mg m-2 i.v. was administered on day 15. In addition both groups received tablets containing vitamins A and E. Response rates for FEMTX were as follows: complete response (CR), 19% (4/21); partial response (PR), 10% (2/21); no change (NC), 33% (7/21); and progressive disease (PD), 24% (5/21). Response rates in the control group were: NC, 20% (4/20); and PD, 80% (16/20). Increased pain was observed in one patient in the treated group and in 11 patients in the control group within the first 2 months. WHO grade III/IV toxicity in the chemotherapy group was as follows: nausea/vomiting 40%, diarrhoea 10%, stomatitis 15%, leucopenia 50% and thrombocytopenia 10%. One possible treatment-related death was due to sepsis. The median time to progression in the FEMTX group was 5.4 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.1-11.7 months], but only 1.7 months in the control group (95% CI 1.2-2.7 months) (P = 0.0013). Similarly, the FEMTX group displayed significantly (P = 0.0006) prolonged survival compared with the control group, i.e. median survival 12.3 months (95% CI 7.1-15.6 months) vs 3.1 months (95% CI 1.6-4.6 months). In conclusion, FEMTX combined with vitamin A and E is a fairly well-tolerated treatment, giving a response rate of 29% in patients with advanced gastric cancer, and also prolonging patients' survival. It can be used as a reference treatment in testing new investigational combinations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bang, Y.-J., Van Cutsem, E., Feyereislova, A., Chung, H. C., Shen, L., Sawaki, A., Lordick, F., Ohtsu, A., Omuro, Y., Satoh, T., et al. (2010) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61121-x · Cited by 7,302
Van Cutsem, E., Moiseyenko, V. M., Tjulandin, S., Majlis, A., Constenla, M., Boni, C., Rodrigues, A., Fodor, M., Chao, Y., Voznyi, E., et al. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2006.06.8429 · Cited by 1,926
Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2018 (5th edition)
Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (2021) · Gastric Cancer · doi:10.1007/s10120-020-01042-y · Cited by 1,749
Chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer
Wagner, A. D., Syn, N. L., Moehler, M., Grothe, W., Yong, W. P., Tai, B.-C., Ho, J., & Unverzagt, S. (2017) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004064.pub4 · Cited by 1,299
Wagner, A. D., Grothe, W., Haerting, J., Kleber, G., Grothey, A., & Fleig, W. E. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.05.0245 · Cited by 1,171
Metadata
- Authors
- Pyrhönen, S., Kuitunen, T., Nyandoto, P., & Kouri, M.
- Venue
- British Journal of Cancer
- Published
- 1995-03-01
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 587-591
- ISSN
- 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-1827
- OpenAlex
- W1992408996
- Cited by
- 789
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomised comparison of fluorouracil, epidoxorubicin and methotrexate (FEMTX) plus supportive care with supportive care alone in patients with non-resectable gastric cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/bjc.1995.114
- The paper
- Pyrhönen, S., Kuitunen, T., Nyandoto, P., & Kouri, M. (1995). Randomised comparison of fluorouracil, epidoxorubicin and methotrexate (FEMTX) plus supportive care with supportive care alone in patients with non-resectable gastric cancer. British Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1995.114
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.