The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Psychological distress in head and neck cancer patients 7-11 years after curative treatment
Open accessAbstract
Long-term survivors of head and neck cancer may suffer from psychological distress and reduced quality of life because of late side-effects of the treatment. In a follow-up study of patients randomised to two different radiation fractionating regimens, 204 patients filled in a mailed questionnaire 7-11 years after treatment. The questionnaire consisted of the General Health Questionnaire, 20-item version (GHQ-20), and the EORTC Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). There were no differences in psychological distress between patients receiving conventional radiotherapy and those receiving a slightly hypofractionated regimen. A high prevalence of psychological distress was found in both treatment groups (30% of 'cases' according to the GHQ-20), especially in patients with impaired cognitive or social function, or with pain. Clinicians need to be aware of this morbidity, and their ability to detect patients with psychological problems needs to be improved. The GHQ-20 can facilitate the communication process in a clinical setting. With an increased awareness of these problems and by using valid instruments for identification of patients at risk, the clinicians may intervene and help the patients to reduce their psychological distress.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Bergman, B., Bullinger, M., Cull, A., Duez, N. J., Filiberti, A., Flechtner, H., Fleishman, S. B., Haes, J. C. J. M. D., et al. (1993) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/85.5.365 · Cited by 16,005
Self-citationScreening for Adjustment Disorders and Major Depressive Disorders in Cancer In-Patients
Razavi, D., Delvaux, N., Farvacques, C., & Robaye, E. (1990) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.156.1.79 · Cited by 514
Cited by
A Prospective Study of Quality of Life in Head and Neck Cancer Patients. Part I: At Diagnosis
Hammerlid, E., Bjordal, K., Ahlner‐Elmqvist, M., Boysen, M., Evensen, J. F., Biörklund, A., Jannert, M., Kaasa, S., Sullivan, M., & Westin, T. (2001) · The Laryngoscope · doi:10.1097/00005537-200104000-00021 · Cited by 190
Self-citationFear of recurrence and possible cases of anxiety and depression in orofacial cancer patients
Humphris, G. M., Rogers, S., McNally, D., Lee-Jones, C., Brown, J., & Vaughan, D. (2003) · International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery · doi:10.1016/s0901-5027(03)90399-1 · Cited by 147
Psychological functioning in cancer patients treated with radiotherapy
Stiegelis, H. E., Ranchor, A. V., & Sanderman, R. (2004) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/s0738-3991(03)00021-1 · Cited by 127
Kissane, D. W., Patel, S. G., Baser, R. E., Bell, R., Farberov, M., Ostroff, J. S., Li, Y., Singh, B., Kraus, D. H., & Shah, J. P. (2013) · Head & Neck · doi:10.1002/hed.22943 · Cited by 110
Hess, C. B., & Chen, A. M. (2014) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.3521 · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Bjordal, K., & Kaasa, S.
- Venue
- British Journal of Cancer
- Published
- 1995-03
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 592-597
- ISSN
- 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-1827
- OpenAlex
- W2054527785
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Psychological distress in head and neck cancer patients 7-11 years after curative treatment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/bjc.1995.115
- The paper
- Bjordal, K., & Kaasa, S. (1995). Psychological distress in head and neck cancer patients 7-11 years after curative treatment. British Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1995.115
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.