Cited by 190Head and Neck Cancer StudiesCancer survivorship and careOral health in cancer treatment

A Prospective Study of Quality of Life in Head and Neck Cancer Patients. Part I: At Diagnosis

Hammerlid, Eva, Bjordal, Kristin, Ahlner‐Elmqvist, Marianne, Boysen, Morten, Evensen, Jan F., Biörklund, Anders, Jannert, Magnus, Kaasa, Stein +2 more·2001·The Laryngoscope

Abstract

Purpose A Swedish and Norwegian study was designed to examine health‐related quality of life (HQL) in patients with head and neck cancer (head and neck) at diagnosis and during treatment and rehabilitation. The overall aim was to examine the impact on HQL at diagnosis depending on tumor location, stage, sex, and age (part I) and to describe HQL longitudinally and determine for which patients and during which period HQL deteriorated most (part II). This article presents the results at diagnosis. Method Patients with head and neck cancer at five hospitals in Sweden and Norway were consecutively requested to participate. They were asked to answer the EORTC QLQ‐C30 and QLQ‐H&N35 (the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Core 30 questionnaire and head and neck cancer module) repeatedly during 1 year. A total of 357 patients (mean age, 63 y; 72% males) were included. Results Patients with different tumor locations all had their special problems at diagnosis, for example, those with tumors in the larynx with communication, those with oral tumors with pain, and those with pharyngeal tumors with nutrition and pain. The patients with hypopharyngeal cancer reported the worst HQL. Stage appeared to have the strongest impact on HQL. Patients with a more advanced tumor stage reported significantly worse HQL scores for 24 of 32 variables reflecting functioning or problems. The females scored worse than the males for some areas, in particular, emotional functioning. The older patients scored significantly better for emotional and social functioning than patients <65 years but worse for physical functioning and various symptoms. The traditional way of grouping the tumor locations into oral, pharyngeal, laryngeal, and “other” tumors (salivary gland, sinus and nose, and unknown primary) was tested from a HQL point of view and found to be consistent. Conclusions The chosen questionnaires differentiated between different sites of head and neck cancer at diagnosis. Tumor stage had the most powerful impact on HQL score.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00005537-200104000-00021

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hammerlid, E., Bjordal, K., Ahlner‐Elmqvist, M., Boysen, M., Evensen, J. F., Biörklund, A., Jannert, M., Kaasa, S., Sullivan, M., & Westin, T.
Affiliations
  • Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
  • Skåne University Hospital (SE)
Corresponding author
Hammerlid, Eva
Venue
The Laryngoscope
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-04
Volume
111
Issue
4
Pages
669-680
ISSN
  • 0023-852X (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-4995
OpenAlex
W1973812902
Cited by
190
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 11
FWCI
5.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Laryngoscope (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
  • Malmö University Publications (Malmö University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Head and Neck Cancer Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Oral health in cancer treatment
Keywords
head and neck cancer, health-related quality of life, tumor location, tumor stage, laryngeal cancer, oral cancer, pharyngeal cancer, hypopharyngeal cancer, sex differences, age differences, EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-H&N35, symptom burden, emotional functioning, social functioning, physical function
MeSH terms
Aged, Female, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Norway, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sweden

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review