The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Loss of antigen-presenting molecules (MHC class I and TAP-1) in lung cancer
Open accessAbstract
Presentation of endogenous antigenic peptides to cytotoxic T lymphocytes is mediated by the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules. For the stable assembly of MHC class I complex it is necessary that the antigenic peptide is transported by the MHC-encoded transporters TAP-1 and TAP-2 into a pre-Golgi region. T-cell-mediated host-vs-tumour response might therefore depend on the presence of these molecules on tumour cells. The presence of MHC class I antigens and TAP-1 was studied in a series of 93 resection specimens of non-small-cell lung carcinomas (NSCLCs) by immunohistochemical methods using antibodies against the assembled class I molecule, beta 2-microglobulin (beta 2-m), heavy-chain A locus, A2 allele and TAP-1 protein. Eighty-six patients were included in the survival analysis. Total loss of class I molecule was observed in 38% of the cases and was usually accompanied by loss of beta 2-m and of heavy chain A locus. Selective loss of A locus was seen in 8.3% and of A2 allele in 27% of the cases. TAP-1 loss was always combined with beta 2-m and/or heavy chain A locus loss. No correlation was found between the expressional status of any of the above molecules, including the selective A2 allelic loss and histological type, degree of differentiation, tumoral stage, nodal stage and survival. Our findings suggest that loss of antigen-presenting molecules (including both MHC class I alleles and TAP-1) is a frequent event in lung cancer. However, the immunophenotypic profile of MHC class I and TAP-1 seems to be unrelated in vivo to the phenotype, growth or survival of NSCLC.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cancer Immune Evasion Through Loss of MHC Class I Antigen Presentation
Dhatchinamoorthy, K., Colbert, J. D., & Rock, K. L. (2021) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2021.636568 · Cited by 1,077
Natural selection of tumor variants in the generation of “tumor escape” phenotypes
Khong, H. T., & Restifo, N. P. (2002) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni1102-999 · Cited by 1,058
Resistance to PD1/PDL1 checkpoint inhibition
O'Donnell, J. S., Long, G. V., Scolyer, R. A., Teng, M. W. L., & Smyth, M. J. (2017) · Cancer Treatment Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2016.11.007 · Cited by 572
Primary and Acquired Resistance to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Metastatic Melanoma
Gide, T. N., Wilmott, J. S., Scolyer, R. A., & Long, G. V. (2018) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-17-2267 · Cited by 454
New insights into the role of EMT in tumor immune escape
Terry, S., Savagner, P., Ortiz‐Cuaran, S., Mahjoubi, L., Saintigny, P., Thiery, J., & Chouaib, S. (2017) · Molecular Oncology · doi:10.1002/1878-0261.12093 · Cited by 414
Metadata
- Authors
- Korkolopoulou, P., Kaklamanis, L., Pezzella, F., Harris, A., & Gatter, K.
- Venue
- British Journal of Cancer
- Published
- 1996-01
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 148-153
- ISSN
- 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-1827
- OpenAlex
- W2073520179
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Loss of antigen-presenting molecules (MHC class I and TAP-1) in lung cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/bjc.1996.28
- The paper
- Korkolopoulou, P., Kaklamanis, L., Pezzella, F., Harris, A., & Gatter, K. (1996). Loss of antigen-presenting molecules (MHC class I and TAP-1) in lung cancer. British Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1996.28
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.