The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Patient perceptions of the side-effects of chemotherapy: the influence of 5HT3 antagonists
Open accessAbstract
In 1983, Coates conducted a survey that ranked the side-effects perceived by patients receiving chemotherapy in the order of their severity. Vomiting and nausea were found to be the two most distressing side-effects. They have an impact on quality of life and compliance with treatment. The development of 5HT3 antagonists has been a major step forward in the prevention and treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Presently, these antiemetics are routinely used as concomitant therapy in emetogenic chemotherapy regimens. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of 5HT3 antagonists on patient perceptions of the side-effects of chemotherapy. Coates' survey was replicated in patients who received 5HT3 antagonists for acute nausea and vomiting resulting from emetogenic chemotherapy. Patients received the survey to identify those physical and non-physical side-effects that they attributed to chemotherapy and were asked to rank the five most distressing side-effects. Of the 197 patients who consented to take part in the study, 181 were evaluable. Nausea, hair loss and vomiting were described as the three most distressing side-effects of chemotherapy. Eighty per cent of all the patients actually experienced nausea and 57% experienced vomiting. Hair loss appeared to be more distressing to women (P < 0.001) but, in other aspects, gender, age and marital status did not influence the ranking of the three most distressing side-effects. Constipation was ranked as 6th and was not identified as a distressing side-effect in 1983. Nausea and vomiting remain to be the first and third most distressing side-effects of chemotherapy, even though the incidence and severity of acute nausea and vomiting are now significantly reduced.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bolognini, D., Rock, E., Cluny, N., Cascio, M., Limebeer, C., Duncan, M., Stott, C., Javid, F., Parker, L., & Pertwee, R. (2013) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/bph.12043 · Cited by 151
Aprepitant: A Novel Antiemetic for Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting
Massaro, A. M., & Lenz, K. L. (2005) · Annals of Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1345/aph.1e242 · Cited by 73
Thermoregulatory correlates of nausea in rats and musk shrews
Ngampramuan, S., Cerri, M., Del Vecchio, F., Corrigan, J. J., Kamphee, A., Dragic, A. S., Rudd, J. A., Romanovsky, A. A., & Nalivaiko, E. (2014) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.1732 · Cited by 52
Reconsidering Dexamethasone for Antiemesis when Combining Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy
Janowitz, T., Kleeman, S., & Vonderheide, R. H. (2021) · The Oncologist · doi:10.1002/onco.13680 · Cited by 42
Fosaprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting
Ruhlmann, C. H., & Herrstedt, J. (2012) · Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy · doi:10.1586/era.11.199 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- de Boer-Dennert, M., de Wit, R., Schmitz, P., Djontono, J., v Beurden, V, Stoter, G., & Verweij, J.
- Venue
- British Journal of Cancer
- Published
- 1997-10
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1055-1061
- ISSN
- 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-1827
- OpenAlex
- W2046417971
- Cited by
- 378
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Patient perceptions of the side-effects of chemotherapy: the influence of 5HT3 antagonists. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/bjc.1997.507
- The paper
- de Boer-Dennert, M., de Wit, R., Schmitz, P., Djontono, J., v Beurden, V, Stoter, G., & Verweij, J. (1997). Patient perceptions of the side-effects of chemotherapy: the influence of 5HT3 antagonists. British Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1997.507
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.