The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The growth law of primary breast cancer as inferred from mammography screening trials data
Open accessAbstract
Despite considerable progress in understanding tumour development, the law of growth for human tumours is still a matter of some dispute. In this study, we used large-scale mammography screening trial data to deduce the growth law of primary breast cancer. We compared the empirical tumour population size distributions of primary breast cancer inferred from these data to the distributions that correspond to various possible theoretical growth functions. From this, we showed that the data are inconsistent with the exponential, logistic and Gompertz laws, but support power law growth (exponent approximately 0.5). This law indicates unbounded growth but with slowing mass-specific growth rate and doubling time. In the clinical size ranges, it implies a greater decline in the mass-specific growth rate than would be predicted by the Gompertz law using the accepted parameters. This suggests that large tumours would be less sensitive to cycle-specific therapies, and be better treated first by non-cell cycle-specific agents. We discussed the use of our study to estimate the sensitivity of mammography for the detection of small tumours. For example, we estimated that mammography is about 30% less sensitive in the detection of tumours in the 1 to 1.5-cm range than it is in detecting larger tumours.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Validated Mathematical Model of Cell-Mediated Immune Response to Tumor Growth
de Pillis, L. G., Radunskaya, A. E., & Wiseman, C. L. (2005) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-05-0564 · Cited by 649
Lotter, W., Diab, A. R., Haslam, B., Kim, J. G., Grisot, G., Wu, E., Wu, K., Onieva, J. O., Boyer, Y., Boxerman, J. L., et al. (2021) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-020-01174-9 · Cited by 423
A Mathematical Tumor Model with Immune Resistance and Drug Therapy: An Optimal Control Approach
De Pillis, L. G., & Radunskaya, A. (2001) · Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine · doi:10.1080/10273660108833067 · Cited by 425
The Model Muddle: In Search of Tumor Growth Laws
Gerlee, P. (2013) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-12-4355 · Cited by 288
Metadata
- Authors
- Hart, D., Shochat, E., & Agur, Z.
- Venue
- British Journal of Cancer
- Published
- 1998-08
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 382-387
- ISSN
- 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-1827
- OpenAlex
- W2041785903
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The growth law of primary breast cancer as inferred from mammography screening trials data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/bjc.1998.503
- The paper
- Hart, D., Shochat, E., & Agur, Z. (1998). The growth law of primary breast cancer as inferred from mammography screening trials data. British Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1998.503
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.