The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diagnosis of head-and-neck cancer from exhaled breath
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Head-and-neck cancer (HNC) is the eighth most common malignancy worldwide. It is often diagnosed late due to a lack of screening methods and overall cure is achieved in <50% of patients. Head-and-neck cancer sufferers often develop a second primary tumour that can affect the entire aero-digestive tract, mostly HNC or lung cancer (LC), making lifelong follow-up necessary. METHODS: Alveolar breath was collected from 87 volunteers (HNC and LC patients and healthy controls) in a cross-sectional clinical trial. The discriminative power of a tailor-made Nanoscale Artificial Nose (NA-NOSE) based on an array of five gold nanoparticle sensors was tested, using 62 breath samples. The NA-NOSE signals were analysed to detect statistically significant differences between the sub-populations using (i) principal component analysis with ANOVA and Student's t-test and (ii) support vector machines and cross-validation. The identification of NA-NOSE patterns was supported by comparative analysis of the chemical composition of the breath through gas chromatography in conjunction with mass spectrometry (GC-MS), using 40 breath samples. RESULTS: The NA-NOSE could clearly distinguish between (i) HNC patients and healthy controls, (ii) LC patients and healthy controls, and (iii) HNC and LC patients. The GC-MS analysis showed statistically significant differences in the chemical composition of the breath of the three groups. CONCLUSION: The presented results could lead to the development of a cost-effective, fast, and reliable method for the differential diagnosis of HNC that is based on breath testing with an NA-NOSE, with a future potential as screening tool.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00994018 · Cited by 59,421
The WEKA data mining software: an update
Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., & Witten, I. H. (2009) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/1656274.1656278 · Cited by 17,750
Cited by
Volatile Organic Compounds of Lung Cancer and Possible Biochemical Pathways
Hakim, M., Broza, Y. Y., Barash, O., Peled, N., Phillips, M., Amann, A., & Haick, H. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr300174a · Cited by 953
Self-citationReview—Non-Invasive Monitoring of Human Health by Exhaled Breath Analysis: A Comprehensive Review
Das, S., & Pal, M. (2020) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1945-7111/ab67a6 · Cited by 466
Advanced Materials for Health Monitoring with Skin‐Based Wearable Devices
Jin, H., Abu‐Raya, Y. S., & Haick, H. (2017) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.201700024 · Cited by 317
Self-citationBreath Analysis as a Potential and Non-Invasive Frontier in Disease Diagnosis: An Overview
Pereira, J., Porto-Figueira, P., Cavaco, C., Taunk, K., Rapole, S., Dhakne, R., Nagarajaram, H., & Câmara, J. (2015) · Metabolites · doi:10.3390/metabo5010003 · Cited by 301
Mogera, U., Sagade, A. A., George, S. J., & Kulkarni, G. U. (2014) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep04103 · Cited by 259
Metadata
- Authors
- Hakim, M., Billan, S., Tisch, U., Peng, G., Dvrokind, I., Marom, O., Abdah-Bortnyak, R., Kuten, A., & Haick, H.
- Venue
- British Journal of Cancer
- Published
- 2011-04-19
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1649-1655
- ISSN
- 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-1827
- OpenAlex
- W2132852271
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diagnosis of head-and-neck cancer from exhaled breath. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/bjc.2011.128
- The paper
- Hakim, M., Billan, S., Tisch, U., Peng, G., Dvrokind, I., Marom, O., Abdah-Bortnyak, R., Kuten, A., & Haick, H. (2011). Diagnosis of head-and-neck cancer from exhaled breath. British Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.128
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.