The DOI matches its Crossref record; 246 of the 246 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Breath Analysis as a Potential and Non-Invasive Frontier in Disease Diagnosis: An Overview
Open accessAbstract
Currently, a small number of diseases, particularly cardiovascular (CVDs), oncologic (ODs), neurodegenerative (NDDs), chronic respiratory diseases, as well as diabetes, form a severe burden to most of the countries worldwide. Hence, there is an urgent need for development of efficient diagnostic tools, particularly those enabling reliable detection of diseases, at their early stages, preferably using non-invasive approaches. Breath analysis is a non-invasive approach relying only on the characterisation of volatile composition of the exhaled breath (EB) that in turn reflects the volatile composition of the bloodstream and airways and therefore the status and condition of the whole organism metabolism. Advanced sampling procedures (solid-phase and needle traps microextraction) coupled with modern analytical technologies (proton transfer reaction mass spectrometry, selected ion flow tube mass spectrometry, ion mobility spectrometry, e-noses, etc.) allow the characterisation of EB composition to an unprecedented level. However, a key challenge in EB analysis is the proper statistical analysis and interpretation of the large and heterogeneous datasets obtained from EB research. There is no standard statistical framework/protocol yet available in literature that can be used for EB data analysis towards discovery of biomarkers for use in a typical clinical setup. Nevertheless, EB analysis has immense potential towards development of biomarkers for the early disease diagnosis of diseases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Siegel, R., Naishadham, D., & Jemal, A. (2012) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.20138 · Cited by 10,679
A tutorial on spectral clustering
von Luxburg, U. (2007) · Statistics and Computing · doi:10.1007/s11222-007-9033-z · Cited by 10,349
PLS-regression: a basic tool of chemometrics
Wold, S., Sjöström, M., & Eriksson, L. (2001) · Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems · doi:10.1016/s0169-7439(01)00155-1 · Cited by 10,084
Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD Initiative.
Bossuyt, P. M., Reitsma, J. B., Bruns, D. E., Gatsonis, C. A., Glasziou, P. P., Irwig, L. M., Lijmer, J. G., Moher, D., Rennie, D., de Vet, H. C. W., et al. (2003) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-138-1-200301070-00010 · Cited by 3,219
Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative
Bossuyt, P. M., Reitsma, J. B., Bruns, D. E., Gatsonis, C. A., Glasziou, P. P., Irwig, L. M., Lijmer, J. G., Moher, D., Rennie, D., & de Vet, H. C. W. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7379.41 · Cited by 3,215
Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative
Bossuyt, P. M., Reitsma, J. B., Bruns, D. E., Gatsonis, C. A., Glasziou, P. P., Irwig, L. M., Lijmer, J. G., Moher, D., Rennie, D., & de Vet, H. C. W. (2003) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2261021292 · Cited by 3,215
Dweik, R. A., Boggs, P. B., Erzurum, S. C., Irvin, C. G., Leigh, M. W., Lundberg, J. O., Olin, A.-C., Plummer, A. L., & Taylor, D. R. (2011) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.9120-11st · Cited by 2,539
Obesity and Diabetes in the Developing World — A Growing Challenge
Hossain, P., Kawar, B., & El Nahas, M. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmp068177 · Cited by 2,200
HMDB: a knowledgebase for the human metabolome
Wishart, D. S., Knox, C., Guo, A. C., Eisner, R., Young, N., Gautam, B., Hau, D. D., Psychogios, N., Dong, E., Bouatra, S., et al. (2009) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkn810 · Cited by 1,873
Biological and chemical sensors based on graphene materials
Liu, Y., Dong, X., & Chen, P. (2012) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c1cs15270j · Cited by 1,748
Cited by
Sensors for Volatile Organic Compounds
Khatib, M., & Haick, H. (2022) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.1c10827 · Cited by 533
Humidity-activated ammonia sensor with excellent selectivity for exhaled breath analysis
Liu, L., Fei, T., Guan, X., Zhao, H., & Zhang, T. (2021) · Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical · doi:10.1016/j.snb.2021.129625 · Cited by 100
Liu, L., Fei, T., Guan, X., Zhao, H., & Zhang, T. (2021) · Biosensors and Bioelectronics · doi:10.1016/j.bios.2021.113459 · Cited by 60
Peel, A. M., Wilkinson, M., Sinha, A., Loke, Y. K., Fowler, S. J., & Wilson, A. M. (2020) · Respiratory Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2020.105984 · Cited by 40
Raninen, K., Lappi, J., Kolehmainen, M., Kolehmainen, M., Mykkänen, H., Poutanen, K., & Raatikainen, O. (2017) · International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/09637486.2017.1312296 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Pereira, J., Porto-Figueira, P., Cavaco, C., Taunk, K., Rapole, S., Dhakne, R., Nagarajaram, H., & Câmara, J.
- Venue
- Metabolites
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2015-01-09
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-55
- ISSN
- 2218-1989 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2012558417
- Cited by
- 301
- References
- 246
- FWCI
- 10.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Breath Analysis as a Potential and Non-Invasive Frontier in Disease Diagnosis: An Overview. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/metabo5010003
- The paper
- Pereira, J., Porto-Figueira, P., Cavaco, C., Taunk, K., Rapole, S., Dhakne, R., Nagarajaram, H., & Câmara, J. (2015). Breath Analysis as a Potential and Non-Invasive Frontier in Disease Diagnosis: An Overview. Metabolites. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo5010003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
