The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation activity worldwide in 2012 and a SWOT analysis of the Worldwide Network for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Group including the global survey
Open accessAbstract
Data on 68 146 hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCTs) (53% autologous and 47% allogeneic) gathered by 1566 teams from 77 countries and reported through their regional transplant organizations were analyzed by main indication, donor type and stem cell source for the year 2012. With transplant rates ranging from 0.1 to 1001 per 10 million inhabitants, more HSCTs were registered from unrelated 16 433 donors than related 15 493 donors. Grafts were collected from peripheral blood (66%), bone marrow (24%; mainly non-malignant disorders) and cord blood (10%). Compared with 2006, an increase of 46% total (57% allogeneic and 38% autologous) was observed. Growth was due to an increase in reporting teams (18%) and median transplant activity/team (from 38 to 48 HSCTs/team). An increase of 167% was noted in mismatched/haploidentical family HSCT. A Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats (SWOT) analysis revealed the global perspective of WBMT to be its major strength and identified potential to be the key professional body for patients and authorities. The limited data collection remains its major weakness and threat. In conclusion, global HSCT grows over the years without plateauing (allogeneic>autologous) and at different rates in the four World Health Organization regions. Major increases were observed in allogeneic, haploidentical HSCT and, to a lesser extent, in cord blood transplantation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation
Copelan, E. A. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra052638 · Cited by 2,522
Cited by
Passweg, J. R., Baldomero, H., Chabannon, C., Basak, G. W., de la Cámara, R., Corbacioglu, S., Dolstra, H., Duarte, R., Glass, B., Greco, R., et al. (2021) · Bone Marrow Transplantation · doi:10.1038/s41409-021-01227-8 · Cited by 429
Self-citationXu, L., Chen, H., Chen, J., Han, M., Huang, H., Lai, Y., Liu, D., Liu, Q., Liu, T., Jiang, M., et al. (2018) · Journal of Hematology & Oncology · doi:10.1186/s13045-018-0564-x · Cited by 294
Emerging and reemerging fungal infections
Lockhart, S. R., & Guarner, J. (2019) · Seminars in Diagnostic Pathology · doi:10.1053/j.semdp.2019.04.010 · Cited by 169
Yildiz Kabak, V., Goker, H., & Duger, T. (2020) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-020-05432-x · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Niederwieser, D., Baldomero, H., Szer, J., Gratwohl, M., Aljurf, M., Atsuta, Y., Bouzas, L. F., Confer, D., Greinix, H., Horowitz, M., Iida, M., Lipton, J., Mohty, M., Novitzky, N., Nunez, J., Passweg, J., Pasquini, M. C., Kodera, Y., Apperley, J., Seber, A., Gratwohl, A., & for the Worldwide Network of Blood and Marrow Transplantation (WBMT)
- Venue
- Bone Marrow Transplantation
- Published
- 2016-02-22
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 778-785
- ISSN
- 0268-3369 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5365
- OpenAlex
- W2276882250
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 37.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.