Cited by 101Cancer-related Molecular PathwaysGenomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stressHeat shock proteins research

Reactivation of mutant p53 by a dietary-related compound phenethyl isothiocyanate inhibits tumor growth

Open access
Aggarwal, M, Saxena, R, Sinclair, E, Fu, Y, Jacobs, A, Dyba, M, Wang, X, Cruz, I +7 more·2016·Cell Death & Differentiation

Abstract

Mutations in the p53 tumor-suppressor gene are prevalent in human cancers. The majority of p53 mutations are missense, which can be classified into contact mutations (that directly disrupts the DNA-binding activity of p53) and structural mutations (that disrupts the conformation of p53). Both of the mutations can disable the normal wild-type (WT) p53 activities. Nevertheless, it has been amply documented that small molecules can rescue activity from mutant p53 by restoring WT tumor-suppressive functions. These compounds hold promise for cancer therapy and have now entered clinical trials. In this study, we show that cruciferous-vegetable-derived phenethyl isothiocyanate (PEITC) can reactivate p53 mutant under in vitro and in vivo conditions, revealing a new mechanism of action for a dietary-related compound. PEITC exhibits growth-inhibitory activity in cells expressing p53 mutants with preferential activity toward p53(R175), one of the most frequent 'hotspot' mutations within the p53 sequence. Mechanistic studies revealed that PEITC induces apoptosis in a p53(R175) mutant-dependent manner by restoring p53 WT conformation and transactivation functions. Accordingly, in PEITC-treated cells the reactivated p53(R175) mutant induces apoptosis by activating canonical WT p53 targets, inducing a delay in S and G2/M phase, and by phosphorylating ATM/CHK2. Interestingly, the growth-inhibitory effects of PEITC depend on the redox state of the cell. Further, PEITC treatments render the p53(R175) mutant sensitive to degradation by the proteasome and autophagy in a concentration-dependent manner. PEITC-induced reactivation of p53(R175) and its subsequent sensitivity to the degradation pathways likely contribute to its anticancer activities. We further show that dietary supplementation of PEITC is able to reactivate WT activity in vivo as well, inhibiting tumor growth in xenograft mouse model. These findings provide the first example of mutant p53 reactivation by a dietary compound and have important implications for cancer prevention and therapy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/cdd.2016.48

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dietary compound PEITC can reactivate p53 mutants in vitro and in vivo and preferentially demonstrated growth-inhibitory activity in p53-R175H versus p53-R273H and p53-R248Q tumor cells.

    “Dietary compound PEITC can reactivate p53 mutants in vitro and in vivo and preferentially demonstrated growth-inhibitory activity in p53-R175H vs. p53-R273H and p53-R248Q tumor cells [133].”

    From The p53 Pathway in Glioblastoma (2018) · cites this paper as [133]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. Liu G, McDonnell TJ, Montes de Oca Luna R, Kapoor M, Mims B, El-Naggar AK et al. High metastatic potential in mice inheriting a targeted p53 missense mutation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97: 4174–4179. 10760284 PMC18187
  2. Muller PA, Caswell PT, Doyle B, Iwanicki MP, Tan EH, Karim S et al. Mutant p53 drives invasion by promoting integrin recycling. Cell 2009; 139: 1327–1341. 20064378
  3. Dittmer D, Pati S, Zambetti G, Chu S, Teresky AK, Moore M et al. Gain of function mutations in p53. Nat Genet 1993; 4: 42–46. 8099841
  4. Hisada M, Garber JE, Fung CY, Fraumeni JF Jr, Li FP. Multiple primary cancers in families with Li-Fraumeni syndrome. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998; 90: 606–611. 9554443
  5. WHO IARC Handbook on Cancer Prevention. Cruciferous Vegetables, Isothiocyanates and Indoles, vol. 9. IARC Press: Lyon, France, 2004.
  6. Talalay P, Fahey JW. Phytochemicals from cruciferous plants protect against cancer by modulating carcinogen metabolism. J Nutr 2001; 131: 3027S–3033S. 11694642
  7. Rose P, Whiteman M, Huang SH, Halliwell B, Ong CN. beta-Phenylethyl isothiocyanate-mediated apoptosis in hepatoma HepG2 cells. Cell Mol Life Sci 2003; 60: 1489–1503. 12943235 PMC11138948
  8. Huang C, Ma WY, Li J, Hecht SS, Dong Z. Essential role of p53 in phenethyl isothiocyanate-induced apoptosis. Cancer Res 1998; 58: 4102–4106. 9751619
  9. Conaway CC, Yang YM, Chung FL. Isothiocyanates as cancer chemopreventive agents: their biological activities and metabolism in rodents and humans. Curr Drug Metab 2002; 3: 233–255. 12083319
  10. Kensler TW, Egner PA, Agyeman AS, Visvanathan K, Groopman JD, Chen JG et al. Keap1-nrf2 signaling: a target for cancer prevention by sulforaphane. Top Curr Chem 2013; 329: 163–177. 22752583 PMC3553557
  11. Kong AN, Owuor E, Yu R, Hebbar V, Chen C, Hu R et al. Induction of xenobiotic enzymes by the MAP kinase pathway and the antioxidant or electrophile response element (ARE/EpRE). Drug Metab Rev 2001; 33: 255–271. 11768769
  12. Xiao D, Singh SV. Phenethyl isothiocyanate-induced apoptosis in p53-deficient PC-3 human prostate cancer cell line is mediated by extracellular signal-regulated kinases. Cancer Res 2002; 62: 3615–3619. 12097262
  13. Xiao D, Lew KL, Zeng Y, Xiao H, Marynowski SW, Dhir R et al. Phenethyl isothiocyanate-induced apoptosis in PC-3 human prostate cancer cells is mediated by reactive oxygen species-dependent disruption of the mitochondrial membrane potential. Carcinogenesis 2006; 27: 2223–2234. 16774948
  14. Wang X, Di Pasqua AJ, Govind S, McCracken E, Hong C, Mi L et al. Selective depletion of mutant p53 by cancer chemopreventive isothiocyanates and their structure-activity relationships. J Med Chem 2011; 54: 809–816. 21241062 PMC3139710
  15. Garufi A, Pucci D, D'Orazi V, Cirone M, Bossi G, Avantaggiati ML et al. Degradation of mutant p53H175 protein by Zn(II) through autophagy. Cell Death Dis 2014; 5: e1271. 24874727 PMC4044866
  16. Ryan KM, Phillips AC, Vousden KH. Regulation and function of the p53 tumor suppressor protein. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2001; 13: 332–337. 11343904
  17. Whitesell L, Sutphin P, An WG, Schulte T, Blagosklonny MV, Neckers L. Geldanamycin-stimulated destabilization of mutated p53 is mediated by the proteasome in vivo. Oncogene 1997; 14: 2809–2816. 9190897
  18. Choudhury S, Kolukula VK, Preet A, Albanese C, Avantaggiati ML. Dissecting the pathways that destabilize mutant p53: the proteasome or autophagy? Cell Cycle 2013; 12: 1022–1029. 23466706 PMC3646859
  19. Bommareddy A, Hahm ER, Xiao D, Powolny AA, Fisher AL, Jiang Y et al. Atg5 regulates phenethyl isothiocyanate-induced autophagic and apoptotic cell death in human prostate cancer cells. Cancer Res 2009; 69: 3704–3712. 19336571 PMC2669844
  20. Joerger AC, Fersht AR. Structure-function-rescue: the diverse nature of common p53 cancer mutants. Oncogene 2007; 26: 2226–2242. 17401432
  21. Xiao D, Powolny AA, Moura MB, Kelley EE, Bommareddy A, Kim SH et al. Phenethyl isothiocyanate inhibits oxidative phosphorylation to trigger reactive oxygen species-mediated death of human prostate cancer cells. J Biol Chem 2010; 285: 26558–26569. 20571029 PMC2924093
  22. Hainaut P, Milner J. Redox modulation of p53 conformation and sequence-specific DNA binding in vitro. Cancer Res 1993; 53: 4469–4473. 8402615
  23. Woodbine L, Brunton H, Goodarzi AA, Shibata A, Jeggo PA. Endogenously induced DNA double strand breaks arise in heterochromatic DNA regions and require ataxia telangiectasia mutated and Artemis for their repair. Nucleic Acids Res 2011; 39: 6986–6997. 21596788 PMC3167608
  24. Liu DP, Song H, Xu Y. A common gain of function of p53 cancer mutants in inducing genetic instability. Oncogene 2010; 29: 949–956. 19881536 PMC2837937
  25. Eklind KI, Morse MA, Chung FL. Distribution and metabolism of the natural anticarcinogen phenethyl isothiocyanate in A/J mice. Carcinogenesis 1990; 11: 2033–2036. 2225337
  26. Iorns E, Hnatyszyn HJ, Seo P, Clarke J, Ward T, Lippman M. The role of SATB1 in breast cancer pathogenesis. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010; 102: 1284–1296. 20595686
  27. Yu X, Vazquez A, Levine AJ, Carpizo DR. Allele-specific p53 mutant reactivation. Cancer Cell 2012; 21: 614–625. 22624712 PMC3366694
  28. Mi L, Gan N, Cheema A, Dakshanamurthy S, Wang X, Yang DC et al. Cancer preventive isothiocyanates induce selective degradation of cellular alpha- and beta-tubulins by proteasomes. J Biol Chem 2009; 284: 17039–17051. 19339240 PMC2719342
  29. Hemann MT, Lowe SW. The p53-Bcl-2 connection. Cell Death Differ 2006; 13: 1256–1259. 16710363 PMC4590992
  30. Sablina AA, Budanov AV, Ilyinskaya GV, Agapova LS, Kravchenko JE, Chumakov PM. The antioxidant function of the p53 tumor suppressor. Nat Med 2005; 11: 1306–1313. 16286925 PMC2637821
  31. Liebes L, Conaway CC, Hochster H, Mendoza S, Hecht SS, Crowell J et al. High-performance liquid chromatography-based determination of total isothiocyanate levels in human plasma: application to studies with 2-phenethyl isothiocyanate. Anal Biochem 2001; 291: 279–289. 11401302
  32. Getahun SM, Chung FL. Conversion of glucosinolates to isothiocyanates in humans after ingestion of cooked watercress. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1999; 8: 447–451. 10350441
  33. Freed-Pastor WA, Prives C. Mutant p53: one name, many proteins. Genes Dev 2012; 26: 1268–1286. 22713868 PMC3387655
  34. Hruban RH, Goggins M, Parsons J, Kern SE. Progression model for pancreatic cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2000; 6: 2969–2972. 10955772
  35. Oda T, Tsuda H, Scarpa A, Sakamoto M, Hirohashi S. p53 gene mutation spectrum in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res 1992; 52: 6358–6364. 1330291
  36. Kubota Y, Shuin T, Uemura H, Fujinami K, Miyamoto H, Torigoe S et al. Tumor suppressor gene p53 mutations in human prostate cancer. Prostate 1995; 27: 18–24. 7603913
  37. Done SJ, Eskandarian S, Bull S, Redston M, Andrulis IL. p53 missense mutations in microdissected high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001; 93: 700–704. 11333292
  38. Iakova P, Timchenko L, Timchenko NA. Intracellular signaling and hepatocellular carcinoma. Semin Cancer Biol 2011; 21: 28–34. 20850540 PMC3228644
  39. Aggarwal M, Sommers JA, Shoemaker RH, Brosh RM Jr. Inhibition of helicase activity by a small molecule impairs Werner syndrome helicase (WRN) function in the cellular response to DNA damage or replication stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011; 108: 1525–1530. 21220316 PMC3029756
  40. el-Deiry WS, Tokino T, Velculescu VE, Levy DB, Parsons R, Trent JM et al. WAF1, a potential mediator of p53 tumor suppression. Cell 1993; 75: 817–825. 8242752
  41. Conaway CC, Wang CX, Pittman B, Yang YM, Schwartz JE, Tian D et al. Phenethyl isothiocyanate and sulforaphane and their N-acetylcysteine conjugates inhibit malignant progression of lung adenomas induced by tobacco carcinogens in A/J mice. Cancer Res 2005; 65: 8548–8557. 16166336

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aggarwal, M., Saxena, R., Sinclair, E., Fu, Y., Jacobs, A., Dyba, M., Wang, X., Cruz, I., Berry, D., Kallakury, B., Mueller, S. C., Agostino, S. D., Blandino, G., Avantaggiati, M. L., & Chung, F.-L.
Affiliations
  • Georgetown University (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Instituto Nazionale Tumori Regina Elena (IT)
Corresponding author
  • Aggarwal, M
  • Chung, F-L
Venue
Cell Death & Differentiation
Published
2016-06-03
Volume
23
Issue
10
Pages
1615-1627
ISSN
  • 1350-9047 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5403
OpenAlex
W2409136177
Cited by
101
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4
FWCI
7.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell Death and Differentiation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • Georgetown University (CA51008)
  • National Institutes of Health (CA51008, CA100853)
  • National Cancer Institute (P30 CA-51008, CA-51008, CA100853, R01CA100853, R01CA193698, P30CA051008)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stress
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Heat shock proteins research
Keywords
phenethyl isothiocyanate, mutant p53 reactivation, cruciferous vegetables, apoptosis, cell cycle arrest, proteasomal degradation, autophagy, redox state, tumor growth inhibition, xenograft mouse model, cancer prevention
MeSH terms
Autophagy, Cell Cycle, Diet, Histones, Humans, Mutation, Neoplasms, Oxidation-Reduction, Protein Conformation, Zinc, Transcriptional Activation, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, Apoptosis, Isothiocyanates, Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays, Cell Line, Tumor, Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex, Cell Proliferation, Mutant Proteins, Proteolysis, Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Proteins, Checkpoint Kinase 2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review