Cited by 5RNA Interference and Gene DeliveryMelanoma and MAPK PathwaysDNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Obstruction of BRAFV600E transcription by complementary PNA oligomers as a means to inhibit BRAF-mutant melanoma growth

Abstract

Peptide nucleic acid (PNA) oligomers are DNA mimics, which are capable of binding gene sequences 1000-fold more avidly than complementary native DNA by strand invasion and effectively obstruct transcription. Irreversibly obstructing the transcription or replication of a gene sequence, such as BRAF V600E, offers a potential route to specifically target the cancer cell itself. We have employed PNA oligomers to target BRAF V600E in a sequence-specific complementary manner. These PNAs have been modified by appending configurationally stabilizing cationic peptides in order to improve their cellular delivery and target avidity. Our results indicate that exposure of the melanoma cell lines to a modified PNA-peptide conjugate complementary to BRAF V600E mutation sequence results in a concentration-dependent and time-dependent inhibition of cell growth that is specific for the BRAF V600E-mutant melanoma cell lines with inhibition of mRNA and protein expression. Xenograft mouse trials show increased tumor growth delay and necrosis with the BRAF V600E-complementary PNA-peptide conjugates as compared with the saline and scrambled PNA sequence controls. Similarly, quantitative measurement shows a 2.5-fold decrease in Ki67 and a 3-fold increase in terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling expression with this approach. PNA-delivery peptide conjugates represent a novel way to target BRAF V600E and represent a new approach in targeting selective oncogenes that induce tumor growth.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/cgt.2017.34

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PNAs have the advantage of being highly sequence-selective, enabling the targeting of mutant alleles while sparing the wildtype.

    “PNAs have the advantage of being highly sequence-selective, enabling the targeting of mutant alleles while sparing the wildtype [72].”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rothman, J. H., Surriga, O., de Stanchina, E., Vasudeva, S. D., & Schwartz, G. K.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Rothman, J H
Venue
Cancer Gene Therapy
Published
2017-09
Volume
24
Issue
9
Pages
401-408
ISSN
  • 0929-1903 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5500
OpenAlex
W2758489627
Cited by
4
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cancer Gene Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology
  • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
  • National Cancer Institute (P30CA008748)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
Keywords
peptide nucleic acid, PNA oligomers, BRAF V600E mutation, melanoma, transcriptional inhibition, PNA-peptide conjugates, cationic peptides, oncogene targeting, tumor growth inhibition, xenograft tumor model, Ki-67, apoptosis
MeSH terms
Animals, Female, Humans, Melanoma, Mice, Nude, Transcription, Genetic, Amino Acid Substitution, Mutation, Missense, Peptide Nucleic Acids, Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays, Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review