The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The relationship between paroxetine and the sparteine oxidation polymorphism
Abstract
The relationship between the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor paroxetine and the sparteine oxidation polymorphism was investigated in a combined single-dose (30 mg) and steady-state (30 mg/day for 2 weeks) study including a panel of nine extensive metabolizers and eight poor metabolizers of sparteine. The median area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) after the first paroxetine dose was about seven times higher in poor metabolizers than in extensive metabolizers (3910 versus 550 nmol.hr/L), whereas at steady state the median AUCss tau interphenotype difference was only twofold (4410 versus 2550 nmol.hr/L). Plasma half-life and steady-state plasma concentration were significantly longer and higher, respectively, in poor metabolizers than in extensive metabolizers (41 versus 16 hours and 151 versus 81 nmol/L). Paroxetine pharmacokinetics were linear in poor metabolizers and nonlinear only in extensive metabolizers. Sparteine metabolic ratio (MR = 12 hour urinary ratio of sparteine/dehydrosparteine), increased during treatment with paroxetine in subjects who were extensive metabolizers, and after 14 days treatment two extensive metabolizers were phenotyped as poor metabolizers and the remaining extensive metabolizers were changed into extremely slow extensive metabolizers with sparteine MRs of 5.7 to 16.5. The inhibition of sparteine metabolism was rapidly reversed after cessation of paroxetine administration. In the poor metabolizers there were no significant changes in MRs during the study. It is concluded that paroxetine and sparteine metabolism cosegregates, but the interphenotype difference in metabolism was less prominent at steady state than after a single dose, presumably because of saturation of the sparteine oxygenase (CYP2D6) in subjects who were extensive metabolizers. Paroxetine is a potent inhibitor of sparteine oxidation by CYP2D6 in vivo.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Molecular genetics of CYP2D6: Clinical relevance with focus on psychotropic drugs
Bertilsson, L., Dahl, M., Dalén, P., & Al‐Shurbaji, A. (2002) · British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1046/j.0306-5251.2001.01548.x · Cited by 579
Effects of the Antifungal Agents on Oxidative Drug Metabolism: Clinical Relevance
Venkatakrishnan, K., von Moltke, L. L., & Greenblatt, D. J. (2000) · Clinical Pharmacokinetics · doi:10.2165/00003088-200038020-00002 · Cited by 508
Newer antidepressants and the cytochrome P450 system
(1996) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.153.3.311 · Cited by 482
Pharmacogenetics, Drug-Metabolizing Enzymes, and Clinical Practice
Gardiner, S. J., & Begg, E. J. (2006) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.58.3.6 · Cited by 406
Preskorn, S. H. (1997) · Clinical Pharmacokinetics · doi:10.2165/00003088-199700321-00003 · Cited by 370
Metadata
- Authors
- Sindrup, S. H., Brøsen, K., Gram, L. F., Hallas, J., Skjelbo, E., Allen, A., Allen, G. D., Cooper, S. M., Mellows, G., Tasker, T. C. G., & Zussman, B. D.
- Venue
- Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-03
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 278-287
- ISSN
- 0009-9236 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-6535
- OpenAlex
- W1994311873
- Cited by
- 205
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The relationship between paroxetine and the sparteine oxidation polymorphism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/clpt.1992.23
- The paper
- Sindrup, S. H., Brøsen, K., Gram, L. F., Hallas, J., Skjelbo, E., Allen, A., Allen, G. D., Cooper, S. M., Mellows, G., Tasker, T. C. G., & Zussman, B. D. (1992). The relationship between paroxetine and the sparteine oxidation polymorphism. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1038/clpt.1992.23
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.