Clinically Relevant Pharmacology of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors: An Overview with Emphasis on Pharmacokinetics and Effects on Oxidative Drug Metabolism
Abstract
This paper presents an overview of the clinically relevant pharmacology of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) with an emphasis on their pharmacokinetics and effects on cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes. The SSRIs are potent inhibitors of the neuronal reuptake pump for serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) and have minimal effects on a number of other sites of actions (e.g. neuroreceptors and fast sodium channels). For this reason, drugs in this class have remarkable similarity as regards acute and maintenance antidepressant efficacy and tolerability profile. However, individual members of this class differ substantially in their pharmacokinetics and effects on CYP enzymes. Most SSRIs have a half-life (t1/2) of approximately 1 day. Fluoxetine, however, has a longer t1/2 of 2 to 4 days, and its active metabolite, norfluoxetine, has an extended t1/2 of 7 to 15 days. Fluoxetine, paroxetine and, to a lesser extent, fluvoxamine inhibit their own metabolism. That is not the case for citalopram or sertraline. There are nonlinear increases in paroxetine plasma concentrations with dosage increases, but proportional changes with citalopram and sertraline. Indirect data suggest that fluoxetine and fluvoxamine also have nonlinear pharmacokinetics over their usual dosage range. Age-related increases in plasma drug concentrations for citalopram (approximately 130%) and paroxetine (approximately 50 to 100%) have been observed in healthy elderly (65 to 75 years) persons versus those who are younger. There is an age-gender interaction for sertraline, with its plasma concentrations being 35 to 40% lower in young men than in elderly or young females or elderly males. While there is no apparent change in fluvoxamine plasma levels as a function of age, plasma drug concentrations are 40 to 50% lower in males than in females. Limited data from clinical trials suggest that age-related differences with fluoxetine may be comparable to those of citalopram and paroxetine. Marked differences exist between the SSRIs with regard to effects on specific CYP enzymes and, thus, the likelihood of clinically important pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions. The most extensive in vitro and in vivo research has been done with fluoxetine, fluvoxamine and sertraline; there has been less with paroxetine and citalopram. The available in vivo data at each drug's usually effective antidepressant dose are summarised below. Citalopram produces mild inhibition of CYP2D6. Fluvoxamine produces inhibition (which would be expected to be clinically meaningful) of two CYP enzymes. CYP1A2 and CYP2C19, and probably a third, CYP3A3/4. Fluoxetine substantially inhibits CYP2D6 and probably CYP2C9/10, moderately inhibits CYP2C19 and mildly inhibits CYP3A3/4. Paroxetine substantially inhibits CYP2D6 but doses not appear to inhibit any other CYP enzyme. Sertraline produces mild inhibition of CYP2D6 but has little, if any, effect on CYP1A2, CYP2C9/10, CYP2C19 or CYP3A3/4. Understanding the similarities and differences in the pharmacology of SSRIs can aid the clinician in optimal use of this important class of antidepressants.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Fluoxetine is not self-tapering and cannot be abruptly ceased or rapidly ceased as guidelines suggest.
“We should be wary of the idea that fluoxetine is 'self-tapering' and can therefore be abruptly ceased, or ceased rapidly, as guidelines suggest 30,76 .”
From Tapering of SSRI treatment to mitigate withdrawal symptoms (2019) · cites this paper as [76]
Cites
Shimada, T., Yamazaki, H., Mimura, M., Inui, Y., & Guengerich, F. P. (1994) · The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/s0022-3565(25)22379-5 · Cited by 2,785 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hirschfeld, R. M. A. (2001) · The Primary Care Companion For CNS Disorders · doi:10.4088/pcc.v03n0609 · Cited by 661 · see citing works
Role of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in psychiatric disorders: a comprehensive review
Vaswani, M., Linda, F. K., & Ramesh, S. (2003) · Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0278-5846(02)00338-x · Cited by 612 · see citing works
Eap, C. B., Buclin, T., & Baumann, P. (2002) · Clinical Pharmacokinetics · doi:10.2165/00003088-200241140-00003 · Cited by 599 · see citing works
The neurobiology of depression and antidepressant action
Willner, P., Scheel-Krüger, J., & Belzung, C. (2013) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.12.007 · Cited by 519 · see citing works
Tapering of SSRI treatment to mitigate withdrawal symptoms
Horowitz, M. A., & Taylor, D. (2019) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(19)30032-x · Cited by 280 · see citing works
Estimating Risk of Antidepressant Withdrawal from a Review of Published Data
Horowitz, M. A., Framer, A., Hengartner, M. P., Sørensen, A., & Taylor, D. (2023) · CNS Drugs · doi:10.1007/s40263-022-00960-y · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Treatment of Comorbid Tuberculosis and Depression
Trenton, A. J., & Currier, G. W. (2001) · The Primary Care Companion For CNS Disorders · doi:10.4088/pcc.v03n0610 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Empirically supported use of psychiatric medications in adolescents and adults with IBD
Thorkelson, G., Bielefeldt, K., & Szigethy, E. (2016) · Inflammatory Bowel Diseases · doi:10.1097/mib.0000000000000734 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Fluoxetine treatment promotes functional recovery in a rat model of cervical spinal cord injury
Scali, M., Begenisic, T., Mainardi, M., Milanese, M., Bonifacino, T., Bonanno, G., Sale, A., & Maffei, L. (2013) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep02217 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
General Principles of Pharmacokinetics
Preskorn, S. H., & Catterson, M. L. (2004) · Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-18500-7_2 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Preskorn, S. H.
- Affiliations
- University of Kansas (US)
- Corresponding author
- Preskorn, Sheldon H.
- Venue
- Clinical Pharmacokinetics
- Published
- 1997
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- Supplement 1
- Pages
- 1-21
- ISSN
- 0312-5963 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2079507344
- Cited by
- 370
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 23.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Pharmacokinetics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Keywords
- selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, pharmacokinetics, cytochrome P450 inhibition, drug-drug interactions, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, citalopram, sertraline, norfluoxetine, nonlinear pharmacokinetics, antidepressant efficacy, tolerability, adverse effects
- MeSH terms
- Age Factors, Antidepressive Agents, Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System, Depressive Disorder, Humans, Isoenzymes, Liver, Sex Factors, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review