Cited by 44Drug Solubulity and Delivery SystemsPharmaceutical Economics and PolicyPharmaceutical studies and practices

Bioequivalence of Oral Products and the Biopharmaceutics Classification System: Science, Regulation, and Public Policy

Open access
Amidon, K S, Langguth, P, Lennernäs, H, Yu, L, Amidon, G L·2011·Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Abstract

The demonstration of bioequivalence (BE) is an essential requirement for ensuring that patients receive a product that performs as indicated by the label. The BE standard for a particular product is set by its innovator, and this standard must subsequently be matched by generic drug products. The Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) sets a scientific basis for an improved BE standard for immediate-release solid oral dosage forms. In this paper, we discuss BE and the BCS, as well as the issues that are currently relevant to BE as a pharmaceutical product standard. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (2011) 90 3, 467–470. doi:10.1038/clpt.2011.109

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/clpt.2011.109

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Demonstrating that two drug formulations/products are bioequivalent is an essential drug approval requirement for both innovator and generic drug products.

    “Ability to waive in vivo BE requirements using the BCS biowaiver approach can be pivotal to a successful regulatory submission, because demonstrating that two drug formulations/products are bioequivalent is an essential drug approval requirement for both innovator and generic drug products (7).”
  • Ability to waive in vivo BE requirements using the BCS biowaiver approach can be pivotal to a successful regulatory submission.

    “Ability to waive in vivo BE requirements using the BCS biowaiver approach can be pivotal to a successful regulatory submission, because demonstrating that two drug formulations/products are bioequivalent is an essential drug approval requirement for both innovator and generic drug products (7).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [7]Carpenter D Reputation and Power: Organizational Image and Pharmaceutical Regulation at the FDA Princeton University Press Princeton, NJ 2010

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Amidon, K. S., Langguth, P., Lennernäs, H., Yu, L., & Amidon, G. L.
Affiliations
  • Iowa State University (US)
  • Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • United States Food and Drug Administration (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Amidon, G L
Venue
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-07-20
Volume
90
Issue
3
Pages
467-470
ISSN
  • 0009-9236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-6535
OpenAlex
W2019879138
Cited by
44
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University) (submittedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Foundation for the National Institutes of Health
  • Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM037188, GM 037188)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
Keywords
bioequivalence, Biopharmaceutics Classification System, generic drugs, immediate release solid oral dosage forms, drug regulation, public policy
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Biopharmaceutics, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Humans, Therapeutic Equivalency, Drugs, Generic, Policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review