Cited by 423Protein Degradation and InhibitorsChemical Synthesis and AnalysisUbiquitin and proteasome pathways

Targeted protein degraders crowd into the clinic

Mullard, Asher·2021·Nature Reviews Drug Discovery

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/d41573-021-00052-4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although some have entered clinical trials with a primary focus on PROTAC, the diverse range of protein regulation methods has undoubtedly laid a robust foundation for developing drugs targeting previously undruggable proteins.

    “Although some have entered clinical trials with a primary focus on PROTAC, the diverse range of protein regulation methods has undoubtedly laid a robust foundation for developing drugs targeting previously undruggable proteins.477–479”
  • Several PROTACs are now in clinical trials.

    “Indeed, this exciting technology is currently transitioning to the clinic, with several PROTACs now in clinical trials.16,31”

    From Chasing molecular glue degraders: screening approaches (2022) · cites this paper as [31]

  • Chemical diversification of known glue degraders, especially IMiDs, has delivered derivatives that are approaching the clinic.

    “Chemical diversification of known glue degraders, especially IMiDs, has delivered derivatives that are even approaching the clinic.16,31”

    From Chasing molecular glue degraders: screening approaches (2022) · cites this paper as [31]

  • The Helios glue degrader DKY709 from Novartis is in Phase I for solid cancers, tested as monotherapy and with spartalizumab.

    “The Helios glue degrader DKY709 (Fig. 8) from Novartis is in Phase I for solid cancers (currently tested as monotherapy and in combination with spartalizumab, an anti-PD-1).16,31”

    From Chasing molecular glue degraders: screening approaches (2022) · cites this paper as [31]

  • Twenty years after its theoretical conception, at least 15 targeted protein degraders, among them heterobifunctional PROTACs and molecular glues, had entered the clinic by the end of 2021.

    “Twenty years after its theoretical conception, at least 15 targeted protein degraders, among them heterobifunctional PROTACs and molecular glues, had entered the clinic by the end of 2021 (ref.30) (Tables 1,2), and many more are expected to follow.”

    From PROTAC targeted protein degraders: the past is prologue (2022) · cites this paper as [30]

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mullard, A.
Corresponding author
Mullard, Asher
Venue
Nature Reviews Drug Discovery
Published
2021-03-18
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
247-250
ISSN
  • 1474-1776 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-1784
OpenAlex
W3136448722
Cited by
409
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 42 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 78 · 2023: 85 · 2022: 104 · 2021: 48
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Drug Discovery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
Keywords
targeted protein degradation, PROTACs, heterobifunctional degraders, molecular glues, clinical development, drug approval
MeSH terms
Drug Development, Animals, Humans, Proteins, Drug Discovery, Proteolysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review