Cited by 111Space exploration and regulationInternational Science and DiplomacyGeographic Information Systems Studies

Steps to the digital Silk Road

Huadong, Guo·2018·Nature

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/d41586-018-01303-y

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huadong, G.
Affiliations
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
Huadong, Guo
Venue
Nature
Published
2018-01-30
Volume
554
Issue
7690
Pages
25-27
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2794185780
Cited by
111
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 7
FWCI
8.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Space exploration and regulation
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Science and Diplomacy
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Geographic Information Systems Studies
Keywords
Digital Silk Road, satellite imagery, Earth observation data, big data sharing, sustainability
MeSH terms
Africa, Eastern, Agriculture, Air Pollutants, Asia, Commerce, Conservation of Natural Resources, Developing Countries, Environmental Monitoring, Industry, Middle East, Science, Ecosystem, Information Dissemination, Satellite Imagery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review