Cited by 16Belt and Road InitiativeInternational Development and AidSustainable Finance and Green Bonds

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Boost sustainability through social justice in China’s Belt and Road Initiative

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/d41586-018-03051-5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Seele, P., & Helbing, D.
Affiliations
  • Università della Svizzera italiana (CH)
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Seele, Peter
Venue
Nature
Published
2018-03-14
Volume
555
Issue
7696
Pages
311-311
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2791297331
Cited by
16
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Belt and Road Initiative
  • Social Sciences › Development › International Development and Aid
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
Keywords
Belt and Road Initiative, sustainability, social justice, infrastructure development, Chinese foreign policy
MeSH terms
China, Social Justice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review