Cited by 147Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

The search for better animal models of Alzheimer’s disease

Open access
King, Anthony·2018·Nature

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/d41586-018-05722-9

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It typically requires additional expression of human tau harboring mutations associated with primary tauopathy or seeding mutant human APP knock-in mouse brain with human AD brain-derived tau to develop tau pathology in mouse models.

    “It typically requires additional expression of human tau harboring mutations associated with primary tauopathy (94–96) or seeding mutant human APP knock-in mouse brain with human AD brain-derived tau (97) to develop the tau pathology.”

    From Modeling late-onset Alzheimer’s disease neuropathology via direct neuronal reprogramming (2024) · cites this paper as [95]

    In the section on mouse models (page not provided), the paper says that PD-APP mice do not develop tau tangles and that some models use tau mutations associated with frontotemporal dementia, sometimes alongside mutations that produce amyloid plaques. It does not describe seeding mutant APP knock-in mouse brains with human Alzheimer’s disease brain-derived tau. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
King, A.
Corresponding author
King, Anthony
Venue
Nature
Published
2018-07-25
Volume
559
Issue
7715
Pages
S13-S15
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2883910861
Cited by
142
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 16
FWCI
11.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, animal models, cell model, drug development, transgenic mouse model
MeSH terms
Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Callithrix, Disease Models, Animal, Drug Evaluation, Preclinical, Humans, Macaca mulatta, Mice, Transgenic, Middle Aged, Models, Biological, Organoids, Peptide Fragments, Vaccines, Reproducibility of Results, Amyloid beta-Peptides, tau Proteins, Apolipoprotein E4, Presenilin-1, Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells, Translational Research, Biomedical, Neural Stem Cells, Protein Aggregation, Pathological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review