Cited by 41Academic Publishing and Open AccessLibrary Science and Informationscientometrics and bibliometrics research

How Unpaywall is transforming open science

Open access
Else, Holly·2018·Nature

Abstract

Unpaywall has become indispensable to many academics, and tie-ins with established scientific search engines could broaden its reach.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/d41586-018-05968-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Else, H.
Corresponding author
Else, Holly
Venue
Nature
Published
2018-08-15
Volume
560
Issue
7718
Pages
290-291
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2885064209
Cited by
41
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Library Science and Information
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Keywords
Unpaywall, open science, open access, academic search engines, article-level metadata, scholarly publishing
MeSH terms
Research, Databases, Bibliographic, Search Engine, Research Report, Open Access Publishing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review