Cited by 17scientometrics and bibliometrics researchAcademic Publishing and Open AccessWeb visibility and informetrics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 114 of the 117 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The open access citation premium may depend on the openness and inclusiveness of the indexing database, but the relationship is controversial because it is ambiguous where the open access boundary lies

Copiello, Sergio·2019·Scientometrics

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11192-019-03221-w

Cites

114 of 114 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 117 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Mahesh, G. (2012). Open access and impact factors. Current Science, 103(6), 610.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Copiello, S.
Affiliations
Università Iuav di Venezia (IT)
Corresponding author
Copiello, Sergio
Venue
Scientometrics
Published
2019-10-10
Volume
121
Issue
2
Pages
995-1018
ISSN
  • 0138-9130 (ISSN-L)
  • 1588-2861
OpenAlex
W2979362147
Cited by
17
References
117
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4
FWCI
2.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Scientometrics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • AirIuav (Università Iuav di Venezia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Publishing and Open Access
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web visibility and informetrics
Keywords
open access, citation advantage, indexing databases, Google Scholar, Scopus, Web of Science, bibliographic indexing, scholarly communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review