The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Does psychology have a conflict-of-interest problem?
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The medical field would consider not disclosing this revenue stream in publications a violation of their ethical guidelines.
“Although psychology has no clear financial conflict of interest standards about this type of monetary earnings, the medical field would consider not disclosing this revenue stream in publications a violation of their ethical guidelines: readers should be alerted to financial interests they might perceive as potentially influencing findings (Chivers, 2019).”
From Do growth mindset interventions impact students’ academic achievement? A systematic review and meta-analysis with recommendations for best practices. (2023) · cites this paper as Chivers, 2019
This income is not often acknowledged in scientific publications.
“This income is not often acknowledged in scientific publications (Chivers, 2019).”
From Do growth mindset interventions impact students’ academic achievement? A systematic review and meta-analysis with recommendations for best practices. (2023) · cites this paper as Chivers, 2019
Citations
Cites
Twenge, J. M., Joiner, T. E., Rogers, M. L., & Martin, G. N. (2018) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2167702617723376 · Cited by 1,705
Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, W. K. (2018) · Preventive Medicine Reports · doi:10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.10.003 · Cited by 1,304
Twenge, J. M., Krizan, Z., & Hisler, G. (2017) · Sleep Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.sleep.2017.08.013 · Cited by 303
Twenge, J. M., Hisler, G. C., & Krizan, Z. (2019) · Sleep Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.sleep.2018.11.009 · Cited by 162
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Twenge. J. M., Joiner, T. E., Martin, G. & Rogers, M. L. Clin. Psychol. Sci. 6, 296–297 (2018). · DOI
- Wells, E. M. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 4, 109–118 (2017). · DOI
- Falk Delgado, A. & Falk Delgado, A. Trials 18, 125 (2017). · DOI
- The PLoS ONE Editors. PLoS ONE 14, e0215608 (2019). · DOI
- Twenge, J. M. Emerg. Adulthood 1, 11–16 (2013). · DOI
- Twenge, J. M. Emerg. Adulthood 1, 21–26 (2013). · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Macnamara, B. N., & Burgoyne, A. P. (2023) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000352 · Cited by 415
Hardwicke, T. E., Thibault, R. T., Kosie, J. E., Wallach, J. D., Kidwell, M. C., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2022) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691620979806 · Cited by 187
Screen time, social media use, and adolescent development
Odgers, C. L., Schueller, S. M., & Ito, M. (2020) · Annual Review of Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-devpsych-121318-084815 · Cited by 137
Metadata
- Authors
- Chivers, T.
- Corresponding author
- Chivers, Tom
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2019-07-02
- Volume
- 571
- Issue
- 7763
- Pages
- 20-23
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2954381753
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 11.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
- Social Sciences › Education › Academic integrity and plagiarism
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Keywords
- conflicts of interest, financial disclosure, research funding, scientific integrity, psychology research
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Income, Literature, Modern, Psychology, Referral and Consultation, Speech, Reproducibility of Results, Conflict of Interest
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
