How to banish manels and manferences from scientific meetings
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
At the 2021 APSA Meeting, the three major political theory and history of political thought divisions had only two all-male panels.
“At the 2021 American Political Science Association Meeting, the three major divisions devoted to political theory and the history of political thought had only two “manels” (“APSA Annual Meeting & Exhibition 2021” n.d.; Else 2019).”
From The Past, Present, and Future States of Political Theory (2022) · cites this paper as Else 2019
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Past, Present, and Future States of Political Theory
Hunt, E. M. (2022) · Society · doi:10.1007/s12115-022-00703-1 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Else, H.
- Corresponding author
- Else, Holly
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2019-09-10
- Volume
- 573
- Issue
- 7773
- Pages
- 184-186
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2972446385
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 9.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
- Keywords
- gender equality in science, scientific conferences, gender bias, diversity in science
- MeSH terms
- Artificial Intelligence, Chemistry, Congresses as Topic, Geology, Microbiology, Neurosciences, Research Personnel, Robotics, Science, Speech, Time Factors, Vocabulary, History, 21st Century, Social Media, Sexism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
