The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
PhDs: the tortuous truth
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The findings revealed a 72% satisfaction rate among international PhD students, with 36% seeking assistance for anxiety or depression linked to their PhD pursuits (Woolston, 2019).”
From A narrative review of anxiety regulation in PhD students based on Green model (2024) · cites this paper as Woolston, 2019
In the citing paper
“In contrast, only 55% of PhD students in China expressed satisfaction with their PhD careers, with 40% seeking help for anxiety or depression stemming from academic challenges.”
From A narrative review of anxiety regulation in PhD students based on Green model (2024) · cites this paper as Woolston, 2019
In the citing paper
“The factors of anxiety among graduate students are various and universal, such as employment prospects, inability to maintain work–life balance, inability to complete academic tasks on time, high academic competition, and long study period (Woolston, 2019).”
From Global prevalence and trend of anxiety among graduate students: A systematic review and meta‐analysis (2023) · cites this paper as Woolston, 2019
In the citing paper
“As reported that, 85% of postgraduate students spent 41+ h a week on their postgraduate program, still, 74% of them were inability to finish studies in the set time, and 79% had uncertainty about their job and career prospects (Woolston, 2019)”
From Global prevalence and trend of anxiety among graduate students: A systematic review and meta‐analysis (2023) · cites this paper as Woolston, 2019
In the citing paper
“Mental health concerns among early-career researchers (ECRs), including predoctoral (PhD students) and early postdoctoral researchers, have been gaining attention and point towards a potential mental health crisis in academia1–7.”
From Prevalence and severity of mental health problems in early-career researchers: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [2]
In the citing paper
“Doctoral students and postdoctoral researchers share many of these challenges, though some stressors may be more pronounced in doctoral students (for example, supervisor dependency, thesis progress pressure, financial strain and impostor feelings)2,13,14”
From Prevalence and severity of mental health problems in early-career researchers: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [2]
Citations
Cites
Auerbach, R. P., Collaborators, W. W.-I., Mortier, P., Bruffaerts, R., Alonso, J., Benjet, C., Cuijpers, P., Demyttenaere, K., Ebert, D. D., Green, J. G., et al. (2018) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/abn0000362 · Cited by 2,522
Sverdlik, A., C. Hall, N., McAlpine, L., & Hubbard, K. (2018) · International Journal of Doctoral Studies · doi:10.28945/4113 · Cited by 616
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chi, T., Cheng, L., & Zhang, Z. (2023) · Brain and Behavior · doi:10.1002/brb3.2909 · Cited by 92
A narrative review of anxiety regulation in PhD students based on Green model
Ma, Y., Yu, A., Ma, H., Zhao, Y., Liu, X., Zhai, H., & Gao, Y. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1351386 · Cited by 13
Dreisoerner, A., Goetz, V., Frohnmayer, D., Tran, U. S., Voracek, M., & Nater, U. M. (2026) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-026-02505-5 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Woolston, C.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2019-11-13
- Volume
- 575
- Issue
- 7782
- Pages
- 403-406
- ISSN
- 0028-0836
- 1476-4687
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PhDs: the tortuous truth. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/d41586-019-03459-7
- The paper
- Woolston, C. (2019). PhDs: the tortuous truth. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-03459-7