The battle for ethical AI at the world’s biggest machine-learning conference
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Artificial intelligence for good health: a scoping review of the ethics literature.
Murphy, K., Di Ruggiero, E., Upshur, R., Willison, D. J., Malhotra, N., Cai, J. C., Malhotra, N., Lui, V., & Gibson, J. (2021) · BMC Medical Ethics · doi:10.1186/s12910-021-00577-8 · Cited by 435 · see citing works
Toward Trustworthy AI Development: Mechanisms for Supporting Verifiable Claims
Brundage, M., Avin, S., Wang, J., Belfield, H., Krueger, G., Hadfield, G., Khlaaf, H., Yang, J., Toner, H., Fong, R., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.07213 · Cited by 306 · see citing works
“Nor are they able to hold developers to account when principles and behavior diverge, fueling accusations of "ethics washing" [4].”
Backgroundvan de Sande, D., Van Genderen, M. E., Smit, J. M., Huiskens, J., Visser, J. J., Veen, R. E. R., van Unen, E., BA, O. H., Gommers, D., & Bommel, J. V. (2022) · BMJ Health & Care Informatics · doi:10.1136/bmjhci-2021-100495 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Ensuring that biomedical AI benefits diverse populations
Zou, J., & Schiebinger, L. (2021) · EBioMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103358 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
McCradden, M. D., Baba, A., Saha, A., Ahmad, S., Boparai, K., Fadaiefard, P., & Cusimano, M. D. (2020) · CMAJ Open · doi:10.9778/cmajo.20190151 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Harnessing Artificial Intelligence for Health Message Generation: The Folic Acid Message Engine
Schmälzle, R., & Wilcox, S. (2022) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/28858 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Robots for Social Justice (R4SJ): Toward a More Equitable Practice of Human-Robot Interaction
Zhu, Y., Wen, R., & Williams, T. (2024) · Proceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3610977.3634944 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gibney, E.
- Corresponding author
- Gibney, Elizabeth
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2020-01-24
- Volume
- 577
- Issue
- 7792
- Pages
- 609-609
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W3000812661
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 5
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
- Keywords
- ethical AI, algorithmic bias, social harm, machine learning conferences, AI ethics, accountability
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Congresses as Topic, Humans, Prejudice, Social Change, Bias, Biometric Identification
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
