Cited by 43Social Media in Health EducationArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationPublic Relations and Crisis Communication

Harnessing Artificial Intelligence for Health Message Generation: The Folic Acid Message Engine

Open access
Schmälzle, Ralf, Wilcox, Shelby·2022·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: Communication campaigns using social media can raise public awareness; however, they are difficult to sustain. A barrier is the need to generate and constantly post novel but on-topic messages, which creates a resource-intensive bottleneck. Objective: In this study, we aim to harness the latest advances in artificial intelligence (AI) to build a pilot system that can generate many candidate messages, which could be used for a campaign to suggest novel, on-topic candidate messages. The issue of folic acid, a B-vitamin that helps prevent major birth defects, serves as an example; however, the system can work with other issues that could benefit from higher levels of public awareness. Methods: We used the Generative Pretrained Transformer-2 architecture, a machine learning model trained on a large natural language corpus, and fine-tuned it using a data set of autodownloaded tweets about #folicacid. The fine-tuned model was then used as a message engine, that is, to create new messages about this topic. We conducted a web-based study to gauge how human raters evaluate AI-generated tweet messages compared with original, human-crafted messages. Results: We found that the Folic Acid Message Engine can easily create several hundreds of new messages that appear natural to humans. Web-based raters evaluated the clarity and quality of a human-curated sample of AI-generated messages as on par with human-generated ones. Overall, these results showed that it is feasible to use such a message engine to suggest messages for web-based campaigns that focus on promoting awareness. Conclusions: The message engine can serve as a starting point for more sophisticated AI-guided message creation systems for health communication. Beyond the practical potential of such systems for campaigns in the age of social media, they also hold great scientific potential for the quantitative analysis of message characteristics that promote successful communication. We discuss future developments and obvious ethical challenges that need to be addressed as AI technologies for health persuasion enter the stage.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/28858

Cites

98 of 98 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Schmälzle & Wilcox highlight the risks of a dual use of LLMs: while they might further equal access to information, malicious actors can and seem to be using LLMs to spread fake information and devise health messages at an unprecedented scale that is harmful to societies.

    “Schmälzle & Wilcox highlight the risks of a dual use of LLMs50. While they might further equal access to information, malicious actors can and seem to be using LLMs to spread fake information and devise health messages at an unprecedented scale that is harmful to societies50,51,75.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. [18]Jones K Agenda setting in health and risk messaging Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication 2017 Oxford, United Kingdom Oxford University Press
  2. [43]Citton Y The Ecology of Attention 2017 London John Wiley & Sons
  3. [55]Ziegler D Stiennon N Wu J Brown T Radford A Amodei D Christiano P Irving G Fine-tuning language models from human preferences arXiv. Preprint posted online September 18, 2019
  4. [73]Carlini N Tramer F Wallace E Jagielski M Herbert-Voss A Lee K Roberts A Brown T Song D Erlingsson U Oprea A Raffel C Extracting training data from large language models arXiv. Preprint posted online December 14, 2020
  5. [81]Keskar N McCann B Varshney L Xiong C Socher R CTRL: a conditional transformer language model for controllable generation arXiv. Preprint posted online September 11, 2019
  6. [82]Lin Z Riedl M Plug-and-blend: A framework for controllable story generation with blended control codes arXiv. Preprint posted online March 23, 2021
  7. [86]Tan C Niculae V Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil C Lee L Winning arguments: interaction dynamics and persuasion strategies in good-faith online discussions arXiv. Preprint posted online February 2, 2016
  8. [89]Thompson TL Schulz PJ Health Communication Theory 2021 London John Wiley & Sons
  9. [91]Zellers R Holtzman A Rashkin H Bisk Y Farhadi A Roesner F Defending against neural fake news arXiv. Preprint posted online May 29, 2019
  10. [94]Leib M Köbis N Rilke R Hagens M Irlenbusch B The corruptive force of AI-generated advice arXiv. Preprint posted online February 15, 2021
  11. [99]Solaiman I Brundage M Clark J Askell A Herbert-Voss A Wu J Release strategies and the social impacts of language models arXiv. Preprint posted online August 24, 2019
  12. [101]Frankfurt H On Bullshit 2009 Princeton Princeton University Press
  13. [105]Brown TB Mann B Ryder N Subbiah M Kaplan J Dhariwal P Neelakantan A Shyam P Sastry G Askell A Agarwal G Language models are few-shot learners arXiv. Preprint posted online May 28, 2020

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schmälzle, R., & Wilcox, S.
Affiliations
Michigan State University (US)
Corresponding author
Schmälzle, Ralf
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2022-01-18
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
e28858
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3217185924
Cited by
43
References
95
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 6
FWCI
2.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Public Relations and Crisis Communication
Keywords
folic acid, health communication, social media campaigns, public awareness
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Folic Acid, Humans, Persuasive Communication, Health Communication, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review