The best time to argue about what a replication means? Before you do it
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Registered Reports are perceived as particularly useful for replication research because the first stage peer review ensures expert feedback for effective administration of the study.
“RRs are perceived as particularly useful for replication research because the first stage peer review ensures expert feedback for effective administration of the study.”
From Initial evidence of research quality of registered reports compared with the standard publishing model (2021) · cites this paper as [31]
Precommitment to the appropriateness of a replication design may reduce motivated reasoning to accept or reject replications based on the findings.
“Also, precommitment to the appropriateness of a replication design may reduce motivated reasoning to accept or reject replications based on the findings 31 .”
From Initial evidence of research quality of registered reports compared with the standard publishing model (2021) · cites this paper as [31]
Cites
Registered Reports: A Method to Increase the Credibility of Published Results
Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2014) · Social Psychology · doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000192 · Cited by 716 · see citing works
Self-citationNosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691 · Cited by 401 · see citing works
Self-citationAn open investigation of the reproducibility of cancer biology research
Errington, T. M., Iorns, E., Gunn, W., Tan, F. E., Lomax, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2014) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.04333 · Cited by 312 · see citing works
Self-citationWhat’s next for Registered Reports?
Chambers, C. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-019-02674-6 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Experiences of collaborative research
Kahneman, D. (2003) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.58.9.723 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
The effect of horizontal eye movements on free recall: A preregistered adversarial collaboration.
Matzke, D., Nieuwenhuis, S., van Rijn, H., Slagter, H. A., van der Molen, M. W., & Wagenmakers, E. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000038 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Scientists’ Reputations Are Based on Getting It Right, Not Being Right
Ebersole, C. R., Axt, J. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2016) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002460 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Self-citationEllemers, N., Fiske, S. T., Abele, A. E., Koch, A. S., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1906720117 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
A Replication Attempt of Stereotype Susceptibility ()
Gibson, C. E., Losee, J. E., & Vitiello, C. A. (2014) · Social Psychology · doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000184 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
A Secondary Replication Attempt of Stereotype Susceptibility ()
Moon, A., & Roeder, S. S. (2014) · Social Psychology · doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000193 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Replication of the Superstition and Performance Study by
Calin-Jageman, R. J., & Caldwell, T. L. (2014) · Social Psychology · doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000190 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Shan, X., Fung, J. J., Kosaka, A. H., Danet-Desnoyers, G. A., & Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology (2017) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.25306 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Fung, J. J., Kosaka, A. H., Shan, X., Danet-Desnoyers, G. A., Gormally, M. V., Owen, K. A., & Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology (2015) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.08997 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science
Nosek, B. A., Hardwicke, T. E., Moshontz, H., Allard, A., Corker, K. S., Dreber, A., Fidler, F., Hilgard, J., Kline Struhl, M., Nuijten, M. B., et al. (2022) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-020821-114157 · Cited by 770 · see citing works
Self-citationInvestigating the replicability of preclinical cancer biology
Errington, T. M., Mathur, M., Soderberg, C. K., Denis, A., Perfito, N., Iorns, E., & Nosek, B. A. (2021) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.71601 · Cited by 393 · see citing works
Self-citationChallenges for assessing replicability in preclinical cancer biology
Errington, T. M., Denis, A., Perfito, N., Iorns, E., & Nosek, B. A. (2021) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.67995 · Cited by 323 · see citing works
Self-citationSoderberg, C. K., Errington, T. M., Schiavone, S. R., Bottesini, J., Thorn, F. S., Vazire, S., Esterling, K. M., & Nosek, B. A. (2021) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-021-01142-4 · Cited by 289 · see citing works
Self-citation#EEGManyLabs: Investigating the replicability of influential EEG experiments
Pavlov, Y. G., Adamian, N., Appelhoff, S., Arvaneh, M., Benwell, C., Beste, C., Bland, A. R., Bradford, D. E., Bublatzky, F., Busch, N. A., et al. (2021) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2021.03.013 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Klein, R. A., Cook, C. L., Ebersole, C. R., Vitiello, C., Nosek, B. A., Hilgard, J., Ahn, P. H., Brady, A. J., Chartier, C. R., Christopherson, C. D., et al. (2022) · Collabra Psychology · doi:10.1525/collabra.35271 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Self-citation<scp>CMM</scp>—An enhanced platform for interactive validation of metal binding sites
Gucwa, M., Lenkiewicz, J., Zheng, H., Cymborowski, M., Cooper, D. R., Murzyn, K., & Minor, W. (2023) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.4525 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Improving preclinical studies through replications
Drude, N., Martinez‐Gamboa, L., Danziger, M., Dirnagl, U., & Toelch, U. (2021) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.62101 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Strategic ambiguity in the social sciences
Frankenhuis, W. E., Panchanathan, K., & Smaldino, P. E. (2023) · Social Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.32872/spb.9923 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Understanding Replication in a Way That Is True to Science
Haig, B. D. (2021) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1177/10892680211046514 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Cobey, K. D., Fehlmann, C. A., Franco, M. C., Ayala, A. P., Sikora, L., Rice, D. B., Xu, C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Lalu, M. M., Ménard, A., et al. (2023) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.78518 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Effects of selective attention on the C1 ERP component: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Qin, N., Wiens, S., Rauss, K. S., & Pourtois, G. (2022) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.14123 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Center for Open Science: Strategic PlanPreprint
Nosek, B. A., Shaw, L. C., Errington, T. M., Pfeiffer, N., & Zaringhalam, M. (2017) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/x2w9h · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Self-citation#EEGManyLabs: Investigating the Replicability of Influential EEG ExperimentsPreprint
Pavlov, Y. G., Adamian, N., Appelhoff, S., Arvaneh, M., Benwell, C., Beste, C., Bland, A. R., Bradford, D. E., Bublatzky, F., Busch, N. A., et al. (2020) · Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · doi:10.31234/osf.io/528nr · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Williamson, P. C., Pörtner, H., Widdicombe, S., & Gattuso, J. (2021) · Biogeosciences · doi:10.5194/bg-18-1787-2021 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Doing better leadership science via replications and registered reports
Carsten, M. K., Clapp‐Smith, R., Haslam, S. A., Bastardoz, N., Gooty, J., Connelly, S., & Spain, S. M. (2023) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2023.101712 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
How failure to falsify in high-volume science contributes to the replication crisis
Rajtmajer, S. M., Errington, T. M., & Hillary, F. G. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.78830 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citationCheckMyMetal ( CMM ): validating metal-binding sites in X-ray and cryo-EM data
Gucwa, M., Bijak, V., Zheng, H., Murzyn, K., & Minor, W. (2024) · IUCrJ · doi:10.1107/s2052252524007073 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Sharing the Recipe: Reproducibility and Replicability in Research Across Disciplines
Rahal, R.-M., Hamann, H., Brohmer, H., & Pethig, F. (2022) · Research Ideas and Outcomes · doi:10.3897/rio.8.e89980 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Brohmer, H., Hofer, G., Bauch, S. A., Beitner, J., Berkessel, J. B., Corcoran, K., García, D., Gruber, F. M., Giuliani, F., Jauk, E., et al. (2024) · International Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.5334/irsp.522 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Strategic ambiguity in the social sciencesPreprint
Frankenhuis, W. E., Panchanathan, K., & Smaldino, P. E. (2022) · doi:10.31222/osf.io/kep5b · Cited by 12 · see citing works
A framework for assessing the trustworthiness of scientific research findings
Nosek, B. A., Allison, D. B., Jamieson, K. H., Mcnutt, M. K., Nielsen, A. B., & Wolf, S. M. (2026) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2536736123 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Self-citationKaltefleiter, L. J., Schuwerk, T., Wiesmann, C. G., Kristen, S., Jarvers, I., & Sodian, B. (2021) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/desc.13224 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Priestley, D. R., Staph, J., Koneru, S., Rajtmajer, S. M., Cwiek, A. P., Vervoordt, S. M., & Hillary, F. G. (2022) · Brain Communications · doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcac322 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Direct Replication in Psychological Assessment Research
Allen, M. S., Iliescu, D., & Greiff, S. (2023) · European Journal of Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000755 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
How open science can benefit bilingualism research: A lesson in six tales
Ben, R. D., Brouillard, M., Gonzalez‐Barrero, A. M., Killam, H., Kremin, L. V., Quirk, E., Sander‐Montant, A., Schott, E., Tsui, R. K. Y., & Byers‐Heinlein, K. (2022) · Bilingualism Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728922000256 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Can failure be made productive also in Bayesian reasoning? A conceptual replication study
Loibl, K., & Leuders, T. (2024) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-024-09670-y · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Science, misinformation and digital technology during the Covid-19 pandemic
Astobiza, A. M. (2021) · History & Philosophy of the Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s40656-021-00424-4 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Code sharing and reproducibility in survey-based social research: evidence from a large-scale audit
Krähmer, D., Schächtele, L., & Auspurg, K. (2026) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.251997 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Spyrakou, E., Kavouras, P., Markakis, V., Rami, M. B., & Charitidis, C. A. (2022) · Policy Press eBooks · doi:10.51952/9781447363972.ch005 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Voicing Disagreement in Science: Missing Women
Klinowski, D. (2023) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest_a_01322 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Resistance to Critiques in the Academic Literature: An Example from Physics Education Research
Reichhardt, C. M., Small, A., Nisoli, C., & Reichhardt, C. J. O. (2023) · European Review · doi:10.1017/s1062798723000352 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Bramlett, A. A., & Wiener, S. (2025) · Research Methods in Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1016/j.rmal.2025.100275 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Bruna, E. M., Chazdon, R. L., Errington, T. M., & Nosek, B. A. (2021) · Biotropica · doi:10.1111/btp.12912 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citationHow often are replication attempts questioned?
Hensel, P. G. (2023) · Accountability in Research · doi:10.1080/08989621.2023.2198126 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
New Year, New Initiatives for the Journal of Sex Research
Sakaluk, J. K., & Graham, C. A. (2022) · The Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224499.2022.2032571 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Hirschhorn, R., & Schönberg, T. (2023) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-820480-1.00014-0 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Williamson, P. (2021) · Biogeosciences · doi:10.5194/bg-2020-394-ac3
Dichek, D. A. (2021) · Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology · doi:10.1161/atvbaha.121.315965
Williamson, P. (2021) · Biogeosciences · doi:10.5194/bg-2020-394-ac6
Dissociation Between Speech and Emotion Effects in Short-Term Memory: A Data Reanalysis.
Wiens, S. (2021) · Meta-Psychology · doi:10.15626/mp.2019.1635
Năm điều rút ra từ cuốn sách Trí tuệ nhân tạo: Hướng dẫn về tư duy con ngườiPreprint
Ho, T. M. (2021) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/tc453
Ethical research in public policy
Spicker, P. (2022) · Policy Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctv2tbwqd5.12
Ethical research in public policy
Spicker, P. (2022) · Policy Press eBooks · doi:10.56687/9781447363972-010
Brohmer, H., Hofer, G., Bauch, S. A., Beitner, J., Berkessel, J. B., Corcoran, K., García, D., Gruber, F. M., Giuliani, F., Jauk, E., et al. (2024) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/q56rk
Marefat, F., Farahanynia, M., Hamidi, F., Najjarpour, M., Banitalebi, Z., & Alamdar, P. (2025) · Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.37213/cjal.2024.33477
Sodian, B., Schuwerk, T., Kristen, S., Kaltefleiter, L. J., Jarvers, I., & Wiesmann, C. G. (2022) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
- Authors
- Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M.
- Affiliations
- Center for Open Science (US)
- Corresponding author
- Nosek, Brian A.
- Errington, Timothy M.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2020-07-21
- Volume
- 583
- Issue
- 7817
- Pages
- 518-520
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W3043866520
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 5.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Keywords
- replication study, scientific controversy, research reproducibility
- MeSH terms
- Research, Research Design, Reproducibility of Results, Bias, Research Report
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review