Cited by 79Ethics in Clinical ResearchEthics and bioethics in healthcareBiomedical Ethics and Regulation

Henrietta Lacks: science must right a historical wrong

·2020·Nature

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/d41586-020-02494-z

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A frequently cited reason for underrepresentation of certain minority ethnic groups in clinical trials is pervasive mistrust in the healthcare system, often attributed to historical instances of mistreatment and exploitation.

    “A frequently cited reason for the underrepresentation of certain minority ethnic groups in clinical trials is a pervasive mistrust in the healthcare system. This is often attributed to historical instances of mistreatment and exploitation.”
  • The Tuskegee Syphilis study and the Henrietta Lacks incident are examples of unethical and exploitative research.

    “Two infamous examples of such unethical and exploitative research are often quoted: the Tuskegee Syphilis study, in which Black men were intentionally denied treatment for syphilis; and the Henrietta Lacks (HeLa) incident, where the patient’s cancer cells were provided to researchers unbeknownst to her.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Venue
Nature
Published
2020-09-01
Volume
585
Issue
7823
Pages
7-7
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W4245935359
Cited by
78
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 2
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
Keywords
Henrietta Lacks, HeLa cells, informed consent, research ethics, historical wrongs, centenary, human cell lines, medical ethics
MeSH terms
Adult, Anniversaries and Special Events, Black or African American, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Female, HeLa Cells, Humans, Informed Consent, National Institutes of Health (U.S.), Research Personnel, Social Justice, United States, Biomedical Research, History, 20th Century, Social Marginalization, Racism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review