The DOI matches its Crossref record.
‘Tortured phrases’ give away fabricated research papers
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Cabanac, G., Labbé, C. & Magazinov, A. Preprint at arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.06751 (2021). · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Leveraging Artificial Intelligence in Scholarly Publishing
Fatima Zahra, O., Khouloud EL, M., & Soufiane, O. (2025) · Journal of Applied Social Sciences and Humanities · doi:10.71426/jassh.v1.i1.pp1-8 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Else, H.
- Corresponding author
- Else, Holly
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2021-08-05
- Volume
- 596
- Issue
- 7872
- Pages
- 328-329
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W3187389435
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 20
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Academic integrity and plagiarism
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Benford’s Law and Fraud Detection
- Keywords
- research misconduct, research integrity, linguistic analysis, scientific style, plagiarism detection
- MeSH terms
- Linguistics, Natural Language Processing, Retraction of Publication as Topic, Writing, Plagiarism, Research Report
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
