Cited by 27Ethics and Social Impacts of AICOVID-19, Geopolitics, Technology, MigrationInternational Science and Diplomacy

OpenAI — explain why some countries are excluded from ChatGPT

Wang, Simon H.·2023·Nature

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/d41586-023-00553-9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Arthroscopy is a highly specialized field, and individual patient cases can vary significantly in complexity and surgical approaches.

    “Arthroscopy is a highly specialized field, and individual patient cases can vary significantly in terms of complexity and surgical approaches.39)”
  • ChatGPT is unable to capture the subtleties and nuances of individual patient cases.

    “Another potential limitation is the inability of ChatGPT to capture the subtleties and nuances of individual patient cases.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, S. H.
Affiliations
Hong Kong Baptist University (HK)
Corresponding author
Wang, Simon H.
Venue
Nature
Published
2023-02-28
Volume
615
Issue
7950
Pages
34-34
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W4322620171
Cited by
27
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 16
FWCI
6.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › COVID-19, Geopolitics, Technology, Migration
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Science and Diplomacy
Keywords
ChatGPT, OpenAI, AI regulation, AI policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review