‘Set it and forget it’: automated lab uses AI and robotics to improve proteins
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Artificial intelligence, especially generative AI using machine learning, has radically transformed scientific research in less than a decade.
“In less than a decade, artificial intelligence (AI), especially generative AI (GenAI) that uses machine learning (ML) algorithms, has radically transformed scientific research.”
From Autonomous artificial intelligence, scientific research, and human values (2026) · cites this paper as [1]
Scientists use AI systems to analyze data and images, model complex phenomena, design molecules and materials, summarize literature, generate hypotheses, and edit articles.
“Today, scientists use AI systems to analyze data and images, model complex phenomena, design molecules and materials, summarize literature, generate hypotheses, and edit articles [1–4].”
From Autonomous artificial intelligence, scientific research, and human values (2026) · cites this paper as [1]
AI companies around the globe are fiercely competing to develop and market products designed to automate human intellectual labor, including scientific research.
“However, the claim appears to be disingenuous, given that AI companies around the globe are fiercely competing to develop and market products designed to automate human intellectual labor, including scientific research [1, 18, 19].”
From Autonomous artificial intelligence, scientific research, and human values (2026) · cites this paper as [1]
While research execution tasks like technical and experimental work and data collection may be reduced, jobs could be gained in tasks related to research planning or evaluation, hypothesis generation or data interpretation.
“While research execution tasks like technical and experimental work and data collection may be reduced, jobs could be gained in tasks related to research planning or evaluation, hypothesis generation or data interpretation [1].”
From Autonomous artificial intelligence, scientific research, and human values (2026) · cites this paper as [1]
Cites
Self-driving laboratories to autonomously navigate the protein fitness landscape
Rapp, J. T., Bremer, B. J., & Romero, P. A. (2024) · Nature Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s44286-023-00002-4 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Autonomous artificial intelligence, scientific research, and human values
Resnik, D. B., Hosseini, M., & Hauswald, R. (2026) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-025-00908-0 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
- Authors
- Callaway, E.
- Corresponding author
- Callaway, Ewen
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2024-01-11
- Volume
- 625
- Issue
- 7995
- Pages
- 436-436
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W4390738993
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Enzyme Production and Characterization
- Keywords
- laboratory automation, artificial intelligence, robotics, protein engineering, enzyme engineering, thermostable enzymes, high-throughput experimentation
- MeSH terms
- Artificial Intelligence, Enzyme Stability, Enzymes, Robotics, Temperature, Automation, Laboratory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review