Cited by 19Topic ModelingAdversarial Robustness in Machine LearningEthics and Social Impacts of AI

AI models fed AI-generated data quickly spew nonsense

Open access
Gibney, Elizabeth·2024·Nature

Abstract

Researchers gave successive versions of a large language model information produced by previous generations of the AI — and observed rapid collapse. Researchers gave successive versions of a large language model information produced by previous generations of the AI — and observed rapid collapse.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/d41586-024-02420-7

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gibney, E.
Corresponding author
Gibney, Elizabeth
Venue
Nature
Published
2024-07-24
Volume
632
Issue
8023
Pages
18-19
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W4400944866
Cited by
18
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 1
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Keywords
large language models, AI-generated data, self-training, catastrophic collapse, data quality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review