Cited by 14Artificial Intelligence ApplicationsMachine Learning in Materials ScienceArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Researchers built an ‘AI Scientist’ — what can it do?

Castelvecchi, Davide·2024·Nature

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/d41586-024-02842-3

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AI companies around the globe are fiercely competing to develop and market products designed to automate human intellectual labor, including scientific research.

    “However, the claim appears to be disingenuous, given that AI companies around the globe are fiercely competing to develop and market products designed to automate human intellectual labor, including scientific research [1, 18, 19].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Castelvecchi, D.
Corresponding author
Castelvecchi, Davide
Venue
Nature
Published
2024-08-30
Volume
633
Issue
8029
Pages
266-266
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W4402039423
Cited by
13
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
AI scientists, large language models, literary reading, research paper writing, peer review
MeSH terms
Authorship, Humans, Natural Language Processing, Reading, Research Personnel, Writing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review