The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Protein co-evolution, co-adaptation and interactions
Open accessAbstract
Co-evolution has an important function in the evolution of species and it is clearly manifested in certain scenarios such as host-parasite and predator-prey interactions, symbiosis and mutualism. The extrapolation of the concepts and methodologies developed for the study of species co-evolution at the molecular level has prompted the development of a variety of computational methods able to predict protein interactions through the characteristics of co-evolution. Particularly successful have been those methods that predict interactions at the genomic level based on the detection of pairs of protein families with similar evolutionary histories (similarity of phylogenetic trees: mirrortree). Future advances in this field will require a better understanding of the molecular basis of the co-evolution of protein families. Thus, it will be important to decipher the molecular mechanisms underlying the similarity observed in phylogenetic trees of interacting proteins, distinguishing direct specific molecular interactions from other general functional constraints. In particular, it will be important to separate the effects of physical interactions within protein complexes ('co-adaptation') from other forces that, in a less specific way, can also create general patterns of co-evolution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization
Barabási, A.-L., & Oltvai, Z. N. (2004) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1272 · Cited by 7,903
Evolutionary Rate in the Protein Interaction Network
Fraser, H. B., Hirsh, A. E., Steinmetz, L. M., Scharfe, C., & Feldman, M. W. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1068696 · Cited by 869
Structure of the Hydrophilic Domain of Respiratory Complex I from Thermus thermophilus
Sazanov, L. A., & Hinchliffe, P. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1123809 · Cited by 763
Highly Expressed Genes in Yeast Evolve Slowly
Pál, C., Papp, B., & Hurst, L. D. (2001) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/158.2.927 · Cited by 635
Gene Expression Intensity Shapes Evolutionary Rates of the Proteins Encoded by the Vertebrate Genome
Subramanian, S., & Kumar, S. (2004) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.104.028944 · Cited by 250
Huerta-Cepas, J., Dopazo, H., Dopazo, J., & Gabaldón, T. (2007) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2007-8-6-r109 · Cited by 176
Cited by
Emerging methods in protein co-evolution
de Juan, D., Pazos, F., & Valencia, A. (2013) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3414 · Cited by 607
Self-citationRequirements for efficient correction of ΔF508 CFTR revealed by analyses of evolved sequences
Mendoza, J. L., Schmidt, A., Li, Q., Nuvaga, E., Barrett, T., Bridges, R. J., Feranchak, A. P., Brautigam, C. A., & Thomas, P. J. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.11.023 · Cited by 261
Dintner, S., Staroń, A., Berchtold, E., Petri, T., Mascher, T., & Gebhard, S. (2011) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.05175-11 · Cited by 156
Peng, J., Svetec, N., & Zhao, L. (2022) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msab350 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Pazos, F., & Valencia, A.
- Venue
- The EMBO Journal
- Published
- 2008-09-25
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 2648-2655
- ISSN
- 0261-4189 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2075
- OpenAlex
- W2043654227
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 5.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Protein co-evolution, co-adaptation and interactions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/emboj.2008.189
- The paper
- Pazos, F., & Valencia, A. (2008). Protein co-evolution, co-adaptation and interactions. The EMBO Journal. https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2008.189
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.