The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
PeptideAtlas: a resource for target selection for emerging targeted proteomics workflows
Open accessAbstract
A crucial part of a successful systems biology experiment is an assay that provides reliable, quantitative measurements for each of the components in the system being studied. For proteomics to be a key part of such studies, it must deliver accurate quantification of all the components in the system for each tested perturbation without any gaps in the data. This will require a new approach to proteomics that is based on emerging targeted quantitative mass spectrometry techniques. The PeptideAtlas Project comprises a growing, publicly accessible database of peptides identified in many tandem mass spectrometry proteomics studies and software tools that allow the building of PeptideAtlas, as well as its use by the research community. Here, we describe the PeptideAtlas Project, its contents and components, and show how together they provide a unique platform to select and validate mass spectrometry targets, thereby allowing the next revolution in proteomics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Absolute quantification of proteins and phosphoproteins from cell lysates by tandem MS
Gerber, S. A., Rush, J., Stemman, O., Kirschner, M. W., & Gygi, S. P. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0832254100 · Cited by 1,733
Desiere, F. (2006) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkj040 · Cited by 910
Krokhin, O. V., Craig, R., Spicer, V., Ens, W., Standing, K. G., Beavis, R. C., & Wilkins, J. A. (2004) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m400031-mcp200 · Cited by 284
Cited by
The PRIDE database resources in 2022: a hub for mass spectrometry-based proteomics evidences
Perez-Riverol, Y., Bai, J., Bandla, C., García-Seisdedos, D., Hewapathirana, S., Kamatchinathan, S., Kundu, D. J., Prakash, A., Frericks-Zipper, A., Eisenacher, M., et al. (2022) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkab1038 · Cited by 6,125
The Proteomics Identifications (PRIDE) database and associated tools: status in 2013
Vizcaíno, J. A., Côté, R. G., Csordas, A., Dianes, J. A., Fabregat, A., Foster, J. M., Griss, J., Alpi, E., Birim, M., Contell, J., et al. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gks1262 · Cited by 1,918
Selected reaction monitoring–based proteomics: workflows, potential, pitfalls and future directions
Picotti, P., & Aebersold, R. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2015 · Cited by 1,302
Self-citationPeterson, A. C., Russell, J. D., Bailey, D. J., Westphall, M. S., & Coon, J. J. (2012) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.o112.020131 · Cited by 1,288
Quantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics: critical review update from 2007 to the present
Bantscheff, M., Lemeer, S., Savitski, M. M., & Kuster, B. (2012) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-012-6203-4 · Cited by 801
Metadata
- Authors
- Deutsch, E. W., Lam, H., & Aebersold, R.
- Venue
- EMBO reports
- Published
- 2008-05
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 429-434
- ISSN
- 1469-221X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-3178
- OpenAlex
- W2104764521
- Cited by
- 542
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 20.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PeptideAtlas: a resource for target selection for emerging targeted proteomics workflows. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/embor.2008.56
- The paper
- Deutsch, E. W., Lam, H., & Aebersold, R. (2008). PeptideAtlas: a resource for target selection for emerging targeted proteomics workflows. EMBO reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/embor.2008.56
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
