The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Utilization of multigene panels in hereditary cancer predisposition testing: analysis of more than 2,000 patients
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the clinical and molecular characteristics of 2,079 patients who underwent hereditary cancer multigene panel testing. METHODS: Panels included comprehensive analysis of 14-22 cancer susceptibility genes (BRCA1 and BRCA2 not included), depending on the panel ordered (BreastNext, OvaNext, ColoNext, or CancerNext). Next-generation sequencing and deletion/duplication analyses were performed for all genes except EPCAM (deletion/duplication analysis only). Clinical histories of ColoNext patients harboring mutations in genes with well-established diagnostic criteria were assessed to determine whether diagnostic/testing criteria were met. RESULTS: Positive rates were defined as the proportion of patients with a pathogenic mutation/likely pathogenic variant(s) and were as follows: 7.4% for BreastNext, 7.2% for OvaNext, 9.2% for ColoNext, and 9.6% for CancerNext. Inconclusive results were found in 19.8% of BreastNext, 25.6% of OvaNext, 15.1% of ColoNext, and 23.5% of CancerNext tests. Based on information submitted by clinicians, 30% of ColoNext patients with mutations in genes with well-established diagnostic criteria did not meet corresponding criteria. CONCLUSION: Our data point to an important role for targeted multigene panels in diagnosing hereditary cancer predisposition, particularly for patients with clinical histories spanning several possible diagnoses and for patients with suspicious clinical histories not meeting diagnostic criteria for a specific hereditary cancer syndrome.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes
The 1000 Genomes Project Consortium (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11632 · Cited by 7,711
dbSNP: the NCBI database of genetic variation
Sherry, S. T. (2001) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/29.1.308 · Cited by 7,502
The International HapMap Project
†The International HapMap Consortium, Genotyping centres: Baylor College of Medicine and ParAllele BioScience, Gibbs, R. A., Belmont, J. W., Hardenbol, P., Willis, T. D., Yu, F., Chinese HapMap Consortium, Yang, H., Ch'ang, L.-Y., et al. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02168 · Cited by 6,057
Landon, M., Saam, J., Brown, K. L., Moyes, K., Evans, B., & Wenstrup, R. (2015) · Oncology · doi:10.1159/000430097 · Cited by 1,939
Inherited variants of MYH associated with somatic G:C→T:A mutations in colorectal tumors
Al-Tassan, N., Chmiel, N. H., Maynard, J., Fleming, N., Livingston, A. L., Williams, G. T., Hodges, A. K., Davies, D. R., David, S. S., Sampson, J. R., et al. (2002) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng828 · Cited by 1,394
The CORGI Consortium, Palles, C., The WGS500 Consortium, Cazier, J.-B., Howarth, K. M., Domingo, E., Jones, A. M., Broderick, P., Kemp, Z., Spain, S. L., et al. (2013) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.2503 · Cited by 997
Walsh, T., Casadei, S., Lee, M. K., Pennil, C. C., Nord, A. S., Thornton, A. M., Roeb, W., Agnew, K. J., Stray, S. M., Wickramanayake, A., et al. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1115052108 · Cited by 933
Plon, S. E., Eccles, D. M., Easton, D., Foulkes, W. D., Genuardi, M., Greenblatt, M. S., Hogervorst, F. B. L., Hoogerbrugge, N., Spurdle, A. B., Tavtigian, S. V., et al. (2008) · Human Mutation · doi:10.1002/humu.20880 · Cited by 912
The Human Gene Mutation Database: 2008 update
Stenson, P. D., Mort, M., Ball, E. V., Howells, K., Phillips, A. D., Thomas, N. S., & Cooper, D. N. (2009) · Genome Medicine · doi:10.1186/gm13 · Cited by 873
Richards, C. S., Bale, S., Bellissimo, D. B., Das, S., Grody, W. W., Hegde, M. R., Lyon, E., & Ward, B. E. (2008) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1097/gim.0b013e31816b5cae · Cited by 832
Cited by
Germline BRCA Mutations in a Large Clinic-Based Cohort of Patients With Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
Holter, S., Borgida, A., Dodd, A., Grant, R., Semotiuk, K., Hedley, D., Dhani, N., Narod, S., Akbari, M., Moore, M., et al. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2014.59.7401 · Cited by 398
Kurian, A. W., Ward, K. C., Howlader, N., Deapen, D., Hamilton, A. S., Mariotto, A., Miller, D., Penberthy, L. S., & Katz, S. J. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.18.01854 · Cited by 387
Helbig, K. L., Farwell Hagman, K. D., Shinde, D. N., Mroske, C., Powis, Z., Li, S., Tang, S., & Helbig, I. (2016) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1038/gim.2015.186 · Cited by 363
Manahan, E. R., Kuerer, H. M., Sebastian, M., Hughes, K. S., Boughey, J. C., Euhus, D. M., Boolbol, S. K., & Taylor, W. A. (2019) · Annals of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1245/s10434-019-07549-8 · Cited by 346
Susswein, L. R., Marshall, M. L., Nusbaum, R., Vogel Postula, K. J., Weissman, S. M., Yackowski, L., Vaccari, E. M., Bissonnette, J., Booker, J. K., Cremona, M. L., et al. (2016) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1038/gim.2015.166 · Cited by 287
Metadata
- Authors
- LaDuca, H., Stuenkel, A. J., Dolinsky, J. S., Keiles, S., Tandy, S., Pesaran, T., Chen, E., Gau, C.-L., Palmaer, E., Shoaepour, K., Shah, D., Speare, V., Gandomi, S., & Chao, E.
- Venue
- Genetics in Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-11
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 830-837
- ISSN
- 1098-3600 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2023970825
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 27.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Utilization of multigene panels in hereditary cancer predisposition testing: analysis of more than 2,000 patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/gim.2014.40
- The paper
- LaDuca, H., Stuenkel, A. J., Dolinsky, J. S., Keiles, S., Tandy, S., Pesaran, T., Chen, E., Gau, C.-L., Palmaer, E., Shoaepour, K., Shah, D., Speare, V., Gandomi, S., & Chao, E. (2014). Utilization of multigene panels in hereditary cancer predisposition testing: analysis of more than 2,000 patients. Genetics in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2014.40
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
