The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Consensus Guidelines on Genetic` Testing for Hereditary Breast Cancer from the American Society of Breast Surgeons
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this consensus guideline is to outline recommendations for genetic testing that medical professionals can use to assess hereditary risk for breast cancer. METHODS: Literature review included large datasets, basic and clinical science publications, and recent updated national guidelines. Genetic testing to assess hereditary risk of cancer is a complex, broad, and dynamic area of medical research. The dominant focus of this guideline is limited in scope to breast cancer. RESULTS: There is a lack of consensus among experts regarding which genes among many should be tested in different clinical scenarios. There is also variation in the degree of consensus regarding the understanding of risk and appropriate clinical management of mutations in many genes. CONCLUSIONS: Genetic testing should be made available to all patients with a personal history of breast cancer. Recent data are reviewed that support genetic testing being offered to each patient with breast cancer (newly diagnosed or with a personal history). If genetic testing is performed, such testing should include BRCA1/BRCA2 and PALB2, with other genes as appropriate for the clinical scenario and family history. For patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer, identification of a mutation may impact local treatment recommendations. Patients who had genetic testing previously may benefit from updated testing. Genetic testing should be made available to patients without a history of breast cancer who meet National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Finally, variants of uncertain significance are not clinically actionable and these patients should be managed based on their individual risk factors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Richards, S., Aziz, N., Bale, S., Bick, D., Das, S., Gastier-Foster, J., Grody, W. W., Hegde, M., Lyon, E., Spector, E., et al. (2015) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1038/gim.2015.30 · Cited by 32,594
PD-1 and PD-L1 Immune Checkpoint Blockade to Treat Breast Cancer
Hartkopf, A. D., Taran, F.-A., Wallwiener, M., Walter, C. B., Krämer, B., Grischke, E.-M., & Brucker, S. Y. (2016) · Breast Care · doi:10.1159/000453569 · Cited by 30,845
The National Comprehensive Cancer Network: Present and future directions
McGivney, W. T. (1998) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19980515)82:10+<2057::aid-cncr14>3.0.co;2-a · Cited by 16,766
Nishimura, R., Osako, T., Nishiyama, Y., Tashima, R., Nakano, M., Fujisue, M., Toyozumi, Y., & Arima, N. (2013) · Oncology · doi:10.1159/000353099 · Cited by 13,166
Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours
The Cancer Genome Atlas Network (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11412 · Cited by 12,129
Antoniou, A., Pharoah, P. D. P., Narod, S., Risch, H. A., Eyfjord, J. E., Hopper, J. L., Loman, N., Olsson, H., Johannsson, O., Borg, Å., et al. (2003) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/375033 · Cited by 3,680
Domchek, S. M. (2010) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2010.1237 · Cited by 1,494
Prophylactic Oophorectomy in Carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutations
Rebbeck, T. R., Lynch, H. T., Neuhausen, S. L., Narod, S. A., van't Veer, L., Garber, J. E., Evans, G., Isaacs, C., Daly, M. B., Matloff, E., et al. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa012158 · Cited by 1,465
Risk-Reducing Salpingo-oophorectomy in Women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation
Kauff, N. D., Satagopan, J. M., Robson, M. E., Scheuer, L., Hensley, M., Hudis, C. A., Ellis, N. A., Boyd, J., Borgen, P. I., Barakat, R. R., et al. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa020119 · Cited by 1,251
Rebbeck, T. R., Friebel, T., Lynch, H. T., Neuhausen, S. L., van ’t Veer, L., Garber, J. E., Evans, G. R., Narod, S. A., Isaacs, C., Matloff, E., et al. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2004.04.188 · Cited by 1,171
Cited by
Germline Testing in Patients With Breast Cancer: ASCO–Society of Surgical Oncology Guideline
Bedrosian, I., Somerfield, M. R., Achatz, M. I., Boughey, J. C., Curigliano, G., Friedman, S., Kohlmann, W. K., Kurian, A. W., Laronga, C., Lynce, F., et al. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.23.02225 · Cited by 216
Self-citationToyokuni, S., Kong, Y., Cheng, Z., Sato, K., Hayashi, S., Ito, F., Jiang, L., Yanatori, I., Okazaki, Y., & Akatsuka, S. (2020) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers12113320 · Cited by 33
Abdel-Razeq, H., & Mansour, R. (2026) · World Journal of Oncology · doi:10.14740/wjon2692
Metadata
- Authors
- Manahan, E. R., Kuerer, H. M., Sebastian, M., Hughes, K. S., Boughey, J. C., Euhus, D. M., Boolbol, S. K., & Taylor, W. A.
- Venue
- Annals of Surgical Oncology
- Published
- 2019-07-24
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 3025-3031
- ISSN
- 1068-9265 (ISSN-L)
- 1534-4681
- OpenAlex
- W2963845618
- Cited by
- 346
- References
- 44
- FWCI
- 20.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consensus Guidelines on Genetic` Testing for Hereditary Breast Cancer from the American Society of Breast Surgeons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1245/s10434-019-07549-8
- The paper
- Manahan, E. R., Kuerer, H. M., Sebastian, M., Hughes, K. S., Boughey, J. C., Euhus, D. M., Boolbol, S. K., & Taylor, W. A. (2019). Consensus Guidelines on Genetic` Testing for Hereditary Breast Cancer from the American Society of Breast Surgeons. Annals of Surgical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07549-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
