Cited by 17Patient Safety and Medication ErrorsGenomics and Rare DiseasesClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control

Patient safety in genomic medicine: an exploratory study

Open access
Korngiebel, Diane M., Fullerton, Stephanie M., Burke, Wylie·2016·Genetics in Medicine

Abstract

Purpose Concerns about patient safety and the potential for medical error are largely unexplored for genetic testing, despite the expansion of test use. In this preliminary qualitative study, we sought the views of genetics professionals about error and patient safety concerns in genomic medicine and factors that might mitigate them. Methods Twelve semistructured interviews with experienced genetics professionals were conducted. Transcripts were analyzed using selective coding for issues related to error definition, mitigation, and communication. Additional thematic analysis captured themes across content categories. Results Key informants suggested that the potential for adverse events exists in all phases of genetic testing, from ordering to analysis, interpretation, and follow-up. A perceived contributor was lack of physician knowledge about genetics, resulting in errors in test ordering and interpretation. The limitations and uncertainty inherent to rapidly evolving technology were also seen as contributing factors. Strategies to prevent errors included physician education, availability of genetic experts for consultation, and enhanced communication such as improved test reports and electronic decision support. Conclusion Genetic testing poses concerns for patient safety due to errors and the limitations of current tests. As genomic tests are integrated into medical care, anticipating and addressing patient safety concerns identified by these key informants will be crucial.Genet Med 18 11, 1136-1142.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/gim.2016.16

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Korngiebel, D. M., Fullerton, S. M., & Burke, W.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Fullerton, Stephanie M.
Venue
Genetics in Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-11
Volume
18
Issue
11
Pages
1136-1142
ISSN
1098-3600 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2331604885
Cited by
17
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3
FWCI
5.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genetics in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5p50hg003374-10)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (P50-HG003374, R21HG007578, K01HG008180)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Keywords
patient safety, genomic medicine, genetic testing, medical errors, error prevention, genetic test interpretation, adverse events, electronic decision support
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Female, Genetic Testing, Humans, Male, Medical Errors, Genomics, Uncertainty, Qualitative Research, Precision Medicine, Patient Safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review