The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sherloc: a comprehensive refinement of the ACMG–AMP variant classification criteria
Open accessAbstract
PurposeThe 2015 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics-Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG-AMP) guidelines were a major step toward establishing a common framework for variant classification. In practice, however, several aspects of the guidelines lack specificity, are subject to varied interpretations, or fail to capture relevant aspects of clinical molecular genetics. A simple implementation of the guidelines in their current form is insufficient for consistent and comprehensive variant classification.MethodsWe undertook an iterative process of refining the ACMG-AMP guidelines. We used the guidelines to classify more than 40,000 clinically observed variants, assessed the outcome, and refined the classification criteria to capture exceptions and edge cases. During this process, the criteria evolved through eight major and minor revisions.ResultsOur implementation: (i) separated ambiguous ACMG-AMP criteria into a set of discrete but related rules with refined weights; (ii) grouped certain criteria to protect against the overcounting of conceptually related evidence; and (iii) replaced the "clinical criteria" style of the guidelines with additive, semiquantitative criteria.ConclusionSherloc builds on the strong framework of 33 rules established by the ACMG-AMP guidelines and introduces 108 detailed refinements, which support a more consistent and transparent approach to variant classification.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Richards, S., Aziz, N., Bale, S., Bick, D., Das, S., Gastier-Foster, J., Grody, W. W., Hegde, M., Lyon, E., Spector, E., et al. (2015) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1038/gim.2015.30 · Cited by 32,594
ClinVar: public archive of relationships among sequence variation and human phenotype
Landrum, M. J., Lee, J. M., Riley, G. R., Jang, W., Rubinstein, W. S., Church, D. M., & Maglott, D. R. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt1113 · Cited by 3,516
ClinGen — The Clinical Genome Resource
Rehm, H. L., Berg, J. S., Brooks, L. D., Bustamante, C. D., Evans, J. P., Landrum, M. J., Ledbetter, D. H., Maglott, D. R., Martin, C. L., Nussbaum, R. L., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsr1406261 · Cited by 1,496
Grimm, D. G., Azencott, C., Aicheler, F., Gieraths, U., MacArthur, D. G., Samocha, K. E., Cooper, D. N., Stenson, P. D., Daly, M. J., Smoller, J. W., et al. (2015) · Human Mutation · doi:10.1002/humu.22768 · Cited by 356
Cited by
Disease variant prediction with deep generative models of evolutionary data
Frazer, J., Notin, P., Dias, M., Gomez, A., Min, J. K., Brock, K., Gal, Y., & Marks, D. S. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04043-8 · Cited by 791
Nicolosi, P., Ledet, E., Yang, S., Michalski, S., Freschi, B., O’Leary, E., Esplin, E. D., Nussbaum, R. L., & Sartor, O. (2019) · JAMA Oncology · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.6760 · Cited by 365
Underdiagnosis of Hereditary Breast Cancer: Are Genetic Testing Guidelines a Tool or an Obstacle?
Beitsch, P. D., Whitworth, P. W., Hughes, K., Patel, R., Rosen, B., Compagnoni, G., Baron, P., Simmons, R., Smith, L. A., Grady, I., et al. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.18.01631 · Cited by 363
Li, Q., Zhao, K., Bustamante, C. D., Ma, X., & Wong, W. H. (2019) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41436-019-0439-8 · Cited by 106
Wang, W., Corominas, R., & Lin, G. N. (2019) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2019.00258 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- Nykamp, K., Anderson, M., Powers, M., Garcia, J., Herrera, B., Ho, Y.-Y., Kobayashi, Y., Patil, N., Thusberg, J., Westbrook, M., The Invitae Clinical Genomics Group, & Topper, S.
- Venue
- Genetics in Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-10
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1105-1117
- ISSN
- 1098-3600 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2612091911
- Cited by
- 762
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 31.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sherloc: a comprehensive refinement of the ACMG–AMP variant classification criteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/gim.2017.37
- The paper
- Nykamp, K., Anderson, M., Powers, M., Garcia, J., Herrera, B., Ho, Y.-Y., Kobayashi, Y., Patil, N., Thusberg, J., Westbrook, M., The Invitae Clinical Genomics Group, & Topper, S. (2017). Sherloc: a comprehensive refinement of the ACMG–AMP variant classification criteria. Genetics in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2017.37
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.