Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 481

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 105 of the 105 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rethinking phenotypic plasticity and its consequences for individuals, populations and species

Open access
Forsman, A·2015·Heredity

Abstract

Much research has been devoted to identify the conditions under which selection favours flexible individuals or genotypes that are able to modify their growth, development and behaviour in response to environmental cues, to unravel the mechanisms of plasticity and to explore its influence on patterns of diversity among individuals, populations and species. The consequences of developmental plasticity and phenotypic flexibility for the performance and ecological success of populations and species have attracted a comparatively limited but currently growing interest. Here, I re-emphasize that an increased understanding of the roles of plasticity in these contexts requires a 'whole organism' (rather than 'single trait') approach, taking into consideration that organisms are integrated complex phenotypes. I further argue that plasticity and genetic polymorphism should be analysed and discussed within a common framework. I summarize predictions from theory on how phenotypic variation stemming from developmental plasticity and phenotypic flexibility may affect different aspects of population-level performance. I argue that it is important to distinguish between effects associated with greater interindividual phenotypic variation resulting from plasticity, and effects mediated by variation among individuals in the capacity to express plasticity and flexibility as such. Finally, I claim that rigorous testing of predictions requires methods that allow for quantifying and comparing whole organism plasticity, as well as the ability to experimentally manipulate the level of and capacity for developmental plasticity and phenotypic flexibility independent of genetic variation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/hdy.2014.92

Cites

105 of 105 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 105 references

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Ahnesjö J, Forsman A (2006). Differential habitat selection by pygmy grasshopper color morphs; interactive effects of temperature and predator avoidance. Evol Ecol 20: 235–257. · doi:10.1007/s10682-006-6178-8
  2. Arnold SJ (1988). Proceedings of the Second Interntaional Conference on Quantitative Genetics. In: Weir BS, Goodman MM, Eisen EJ, Namkong G (eds). Sinauer Associates, pp 619–636.
  3. Bruni NC, Young JP, Dengler NG (1996). Leaf developmental plasticity of Ranunculus flabellaris in response to terrestrial and submerged environments. Can J Bot 74: 823–837. · doi:10.1139/b96-103
  4. Chun YJ (2011). Phenotypic plasticity of introduced versus native purple loosestrife: univariate and multivariate reaction norm approaches. Biol Invasions 13: 819–829. · doi:10.1007/s10530-010-9871-z
  5. Forsman A (1995). Heating rates and body temperature variation in melanistic and zigzag Vipera berus: does colour make a difference? Ann Zool Fennici 32: 365–374.
  6. Forsman A (1996a). Body size and net energy gain in gape-limited predators: a model. J Herpetol 30: 307–319. · doi:10.2307/1565167
  7. Forsman A, Lindell LE (1993). The advantage of a big head - swallowing performance in adders, Vipera berus. Funct Ecol 7: 183–189. · doi:10.2307/2389885
  8. Krebs RA, Feder ME (1998). Experimental manipulation of the cost of thermal acclimation in Drosophila melanogaster. Biol J Linn Soc 63: 593–601.
  9. Lindell LE, Forsman A (1996). Density effects and snake predation: prey limitation and reduced growth rate of adders at high density of conspecifics. Can J Zool 74: 1000–1007. · doi:10.1139/z96-113
  10. Lindell LE, Forsman A, Merilä J (1993). Variation in number of ventral scales in snakes - effects on body size, growth-rate and survival in the adder, Vipera berus. J Zool 230: 101–115. · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1993.tb02675.x
  11. Pigliucci M, Pollard H, Cruzan MB (2003). Comparative studies of evolutionary responses to light environments in Arabidopsis. Am Nat 161: 68–82. · doi:10.1086/345460
  12. Reed TE, Waples RS, Schindler DE, Hard JJ, Kinnison MT (2010). Phenotypic plasticity and population viability: the importance of environmental predictability. Proc R Soc B 277: 3391–3400. · DOI
  13. Sarà M (1996). A “sensitive” cell system. Its role in a new evolutionary paradigm. Riv Biol 89: 139–156.
  14. Thaler JS, Karban R (1997). A phylogenetic reconstruction of constitutive and induced resistance in Gossypium. Am Nat 149: 1139–1146. · doi:10.1086/286042

Cited by

See all 481

Metadata

Authors
Forsman, A.
Venue
Heredity
Published
2014-10-08
Volume
115
Issue
4
Pages
276-284
ISSN
  • 0018-067X (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2540
OpenAlex
W1976790721
Cited by
481
References
105
FWCI
26.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rethinking phenotypic plasticity and its consequences for individuals, populations and species. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/hdy.2014.92
The paper
Forsman, A. (2015). Rethinking phenotypic plasticity and its consequences for individuals, populations and species. Heredity. https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.2014.92

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.