The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genome triplication drove the diversification of Brassica plants
Open accessAbstract
The genus Brassica belongs to the plant family Brassicaceae, which includes many important crop species that are used as oilseed, condiments, or vegetables throughout the world. Brassica plants comprise many diverse species, and each species contains rich morphotypes showing extreme traits. Brassica species experienced an extra whole genome triplication (WGT) event compared with the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Whole genome sequencing of the Brassica species Brassica rapa, Brassica oleracea and others demonstrated that WGT plays an important role in the speciation and morphotype diversification of Brassica plants. Comparative genomic analysis based on the genome sequences of B. rapa and A. thaliana clearly identified the WGT event and further demonstrated that the translocated Proto-Calepine Karyotype (tPCK, n=7) was the diploid ancestor of the three subgenomes in B. rapa. Following WGT, subsequent extensive genome fractionation, block reshuffling and chromosome reduction accompanied by paleocentromere descent from the three tPCK subgenomes during the rediploidization process produced stable diploid species. Genomic rearrangement of the diploid species and their hybridization then contributed to Brassica speciation. The subgenome dominance effect and biased gene retention, such as the over-retention of auxin-related genes after WGT, promoted functional gene evolution and thus propelled the expansion of rich morphotypes in the Brassica species. In conclusion, the WGT event initiated subsequent genomic and gene-level evolution, which further drove Brassica speciation and created rich morphotypes in each species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana
Initiative, T. A. G. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35048692 · Cited by 9,301
Genome sequence of the palaeopolyploid soybean
Schmutz, J., Cannon, S. B., Schlueter, J., Ma, J., Mitros, T., Nelson, W., Hyten, D. L., Song, Q., Thelen, J. J., Cheng, J., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08670 · Cited by 4,463
The B73 Maize Genome: Complexity, Diversity, and Dynamics
Schnable, P. S., Ware, D., Fulton, R. S., Stein, J. C., Wei, F., Pasternak, S., Liang, C., Zhang, J., Fulton, L., Graves, T. A., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1178534 · Cited by 4,046
The genome of the mesopolyploid crop species Brassica rapa
The Brassica rapa Genome Sequencing Project Consortium, Wang, X., Wang, H., Wang, J., Sun, R., Wu, J., Liu, S., Bai, Y., Mun, J.-H., Bancroft, I., et al. (2011) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.919 · Cited by 2,074
Self-citationThe Brassica oleracea genome reveals the asymmetrical evolution of polyploid genomes
Liu, S., Liu, Y., Yang, X., Tong, C., Edwards, D., Parkin, I. A. P., Zhao, M., Ma, J., Yu, J., Huang, S., et al. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms4930 · Cited by 1,161
Self-citationRecent advances and emerging trends in plant hormone signalling
Santner, A., & Estelle, M. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08122 · Cited by 960
The Arabidopsis lyrata genome sequence and the basis of rapid genome size change
Hu, T. T., Pattyn, P., Bakker, E. G., Cao, J., Cheng, J.-F., Clark, R. M., Fahlgren, N., Fawcett, J. A., Grimwood, J., Gundlach, H., et al. (2011) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.807 · Cited by 872
Self-citationDifferentiation of the maize subgenomes by genome dominance and both ancient and ongoing gene loss
Schnable, J. C., Springer, N. M., & Freeling, M. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1101368108 · Cited by 708
Hollister, J. D., & Gaut, B. S. (2009) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.091678.109 · Cited by 674
Cited by
Cheng, F., Sun, R., Hou, X., Zheng, H., Zhang, F., Zhang, Y., Liu, B., Liang, J., Zhuang, M., Liu, Y., et al. (2016) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3634 · Cited by 382
Self-citationMagwanga, R. O., Lu, P., Kirungu, J. N., Lu, H., Wang, X., Cai, X., Zhou, Z., Zhang, Z., Salih, H., Wang, K., et al. (2018) · BMC Genetics · doi:10.1186/s12863-017-0596-1 · Cited by 285
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Cheng, F., Wu, J., & Wang, X.
- Venue
- Horticulture Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-05-21
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 14024-14024
- ISSN
- 2052-7276 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2001752098
- Cited by
- 379
- References
- 54
- FWCI
- 19.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genome triplication drove the diversification of Brassica plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/hortres.2014.24
- The paper
- Cheng, F., Wu, J., & Wang, X. (2014). Genome triplication drove the diversification of Brassica plants. Horticulture Research. https://doi.org/10.1038/hortres.2014.24
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.