Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 872

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 83 of the 83 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Arabidopsis lyrata genome sequence and the basis of rapid genome size change

Open access
Hu, Tina T, Pattyn, Pedro, Bakker, Erica G, Cao, Jun, Cheng, Jan-Fang, Clark, Richard M, Fahlgren, Noah, Fawcett, Jeffrey A, Grimwood, Jane, Gundlach, Heidrun, Haberer, Georg, Hollister, Jesse D, Ossowski, Stephan, Ottilar, Robert P, Salamov, Asaf A, Schneeberger, Korbinian, Spannagl, Manuel, Wang, Xi, Yang, Liang, Nasrallah, Mikhail E, Bergelson, Joy, Carrington, James C, Gaut, Brandon S, Schmutz, Jeremy, Mayer, Klaus F X, Van de Peer, Yves, Grigoriev, Igor V, Nordborg, Magnus, Weigel, Detlef, Guo, Ya-Long·2011·Nature Genetics
DOI 10.1038/ng.807
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

We report the 207-Mb genome sequence of the North American Arabidopsis lyrata strain MN47 based on 8.3× dideoxy sequence coverage. We predict 32,670 genes in this outcrossing species compared to the 27,025 genes in the selfing species Arabidopsis thaliana. The much smaller 125-Mb genome of A. thaliana, which diverged from A. lyrata 10 million years ago, likely constitutes the derived state for the family. We found evidence for DNA loss from large-scale rearrangements, but most of the difference in genome size can be attributed to hundreds of thousands of small deletions, mostly in noncoding DNA and transposons. Analysis of deletions and insertions still segregating in A. thaliana indicates that the process of DNA loss is ongoing, suggesting pervasive selection for a smaller genome. The high-quality reference genome sequence for A. lyrata will be an important resource for functional, evolutionary and ecological studies in the genus Arabidopsis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ng.807

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 83 references

Cited by

See all 872

Metadata

Authors
Hu, T. T., Pattyn, P., Bakker, E. G., Cao, J., Cheng, J.-F., Clark, R. M., Fahlgren, N., Fawcett, J. A., Grimwood, J., Gundlach, H., Haberer, G., Hollister, J. D., Ossowski, S., Ottilar, R. P., Salamov, A. A., Schneeberger, K., Spannagl, M., Wang, X., Yang, L., Nasrallah, M. E., Bergelson, J., Carrington, J. C., Gaut, B. S., Schmutz, J., Mayer, K. F. X., Van de Peer, Y., Grigoriev, I. V., Nordborg, M., Weigel, D., & Guo, Y.-L.
Venue
Nature Genetics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2011-04-10
Volume
43
Issue
5
Pages
476-481
ISSN
  • 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1718
DOI
10.1038/ng.807
OpenAlex
W2075436975
Cited by
872
References
83
FWCI
98.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Arabidopsis lyrata genome sequence and the basis of rapid genome size change. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ng.807
The paper
Hu, T. T., Pattyn, P., Bakker, E. G., Cao, J., Cheng, J.-F., Clark, R. M., Fahlgren, N., Fawcett, J. A., Grimwood, J., Gundlach, H., Haberer, G., Hollister, J. D., Ossowski, S., Ottilar, R. P., Salamov, A. A., Schneeberger, K., Spannagl, M., Wang, X., Yang, L., . . . Guo, Y.-L. (2011). The Arabidopsis lyrata genome sequence and the basis of rapid genome size change. Nature Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.807

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.