Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 172

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Maternal diet quality in pregnancy and neonatal adiposity: the Healthy Start Study

Open access
Shapiro, A L B, Kaar, J L, Crume, T L, Starling, A P, Siega-Riz, A M, Ringham, B M, Glueck, D H, Norris, J M, Barbour, L A, Friedman, J E, Dabelea, D·2016·International Journal of Obesity

Abstract

Background/Objectives:Poor maternal diet in pregnancy can influence fetal growth and development. We tested the hypothesis that poor maternal diet quality during pregnancy would increase neonatal adiposity (percent fat mass (%FM)) at birth by increasing the fat mass (FM) component of neonatal body composition.Methods:Our analysis was conducted using a prebirth observational cohort of 1079 mother–offspring pairs. Pregnancy diet was assessed via repeated Automated Self-Administered 24-h dietary recalls, from which Healthy Eating Index-2010 (HEI-2010) scores were calculated for each mother. HEI-2010 was dichotomized into scores of ⩽57 and >57, with low scores representing poorer diet quality. Neonatal %FM was assessed within 72 h after birth with air displacement plethysmography. Using univariate and multivariate linear models, we analyzed the relationship between maternal diet quality and neonatal %FM, FM, and fat-free mass (FFM) while adjusting for prepregnancy body mass index (BMI), physical activity, maternal age, smoking, energy intake, preeclampsia, hypertension, infant sex and gestational age.Results:Total HEI-2010 score ranged between 18.2 and 89.5 (mean: 54.2, s.d.: 13.6). An HEI-2010 score of ⩽57 was significantly associated with higher neonatal %FM (β=0.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.07–1.1, P<0.05) and FM (β=20.74; 95% CI 1.49–40.0; P<0.05) but no difference in FFM.Conclusions:Poor diet quality during pregnancy increases neonatal adiposity independent of maternal prepregnancy BMI and total caloric intake. This further implicates maternal diet as a potentially important exposure for fetal adiposity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ijo.2016.79

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 172

Metadata

Authors
Shapiro, A. L. B., Kaar, J. L., Crume, T. L., Starling, A. P., Siega-Riz, A. M., Ringham, B. M., Glueck, D. H., Norris, J. M., Barbour, L. A., Friedman, J. E., & Dabelea, D.
Venue
International Journal of Obesity
Published
2016-05-02
Volume
40
Issue
7
Pages
1056-1062
ISSN
  • 0307-0565 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5497
OpenAlex
W2343177218
Cited by
172
References
4
FWCI
16.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Maternal diet quality in pregnancy and neonatal adiposity: the Healthy Start Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ijo.2016.79
The paper
Shapiro, A. L. B., Kaar, J. L., Crume, T. L., Starling, A. P., Siega-Riz, A. M., Ringham, B. M., Glueck, D. H., Norris, J. M., Barbour, L. A., Friedman, J. E., & Dabelea, D. (2016). Maternal diet quality in pregnancy and neonatal adiposity: the Healthy Start Study. International Journal of Obesity. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2016.79

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.