The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Distribution and diversity of phytate-mineralizing bacteria
Abstract
Phytate, the most abundant organic phosphorus compound in soil, dominates the biotic phosphorus input from terrestrial runoffs into aquatic systems. Microbial mineralization of phytate by phytases is a key process for recycling phosphorus in the biosphere. Bioinformatic studies were carried out on microbial genomes and environmental metagenomes in the NCBI and the CAMERA databases to determine the distribution of the four known classes of phytase in the microbial world. The β-propeller phytase is the only phytase family that can be found in aquatic environments and it is also distributed in soil and plant bacteria. The β-propeller phytase-like genes can be classified into several subgroups based on their domain structure and the positions of their conserved cysteine residues. Analysis of the genetic contexts of these subgroups showed that β-propeller phytase genes exist either as an independent gene or are closely associated with a TonB-dependent receptor-like gene in operons, suggesting that these two genes are functionally linked and thus may play an important role in the cycles of phosphorus and iron. Our work suggests that β-propeller phytases play a major role in phytate-phosphorus cycling in both soil and aquatic microbial communities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nakai, K., & Horton, P. (1999) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/s0968-0004(98)01336-x · Cited by 2,181 · cited 2×
“Expectedly, these phytases are predicted to be exported to the membrane or to the periplasmic space by the PSORT program (Nakai and Horton, 1999).”
BackgroundMethodDaniel, R. (2005) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1160 · Cited by 862
Cited by
MECHANISMS AND PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS INVOLVED IN PLANT GROWTH PROMOTION BY RHIZOBACTERIA
Martínez-Viveros, O., Jorquera, M. A., Crowley, D. E., Gajardo, G., & Mora, M. L. (2010) · Journal of soil science and plant nutrition · doi:10.4067/s0718-95162010000100006 · Cited by 688
The biogeochemistry and bioremediation of uranium and other priority radionuclides
Newsome, L., Morris, K., & Lloyd, J. R. (2014) · Chemical Geology · doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2013.10.034 · Cited by 476
Hinsinger, P., Betencourt, E., Bernard, L., Brauman, A., Plassard, C., Shen, J., Tang, X., & Zhang, F. (2011) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.111.175331 · Cited by 474
Bacterial Communities Associated with the Lichen Symbiosis
Bates, S. T., Cropsey, G. W. G., Caporaso, J. G., Knight, R., & Fierer, N. (2011) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.02257-10 · Cited by 351
Zhou, Z., Tran, P. Q., Kieft, K., & Anantharaman, K. (2020) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/s41396-020-0669-4 · Cited by 282
Metadata
- Authors
- Lim, B. L., Yeung, P., Cheng, C., & Hill, J. E.
- Venue
- The ISME Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-06-07
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 321-330
- ISSN
- 1751-7362 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-7370
- OpenAlex
- W2005544029
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Distribution and diversity of phytate-mineralizing bacteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ismej.2007.40
- The paper
- Lim, B. L., Yeung, P., Cheng, C., & Hill, J. E. (2007). Distribution and diversity of phytate-mineralizing bacteria. The ISME Journal. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2007.40
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.