The DOI matches its Crossref record.
High diversity of cultivable heterotrophic bacteria in association with cyanobacterial water blooms
Abstract
Cyanobacterial mass occurrences (water blooms) cause ecological, economic and health problems worldwide. Still, little is known about heterotrophic bacteria associated with cyanobacteria and the interactions between those organisms. We isolated 460 bacterial strains from more than 40 lakes and rivers (151 samples), Baltic Sea (32 samples) and treated drinking water of seven treatment plants (29 samples). The water bodies and the raw water of the treatment plants were frequently dominated by high numbers of cyanobacteria. Various growth media were used to isolate the strains. Analysis of partial 16S rRNA gene fragments (701–905 bp for 358 strains and 413–497 bp for 102 strains) classified the isolated bacteria as Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, Firmicutes and Deinococcus-Thermus. Some of these isolates represented possible new bacterial orders, families, genera or species. We isolated various potentially pathogenic bacteria, such as Aeromonas, Vibrio, Acinetobacter and Pseudomonas, that may cause adverse health effects in humans and animals and should be taken into consideration when assessing the risks caused by cyanobacterial blooms. Several strains also inhibited or enhanced the growth of cyanobacteria. Most of such strains had an enhancing effect on the cyanobacterial growth. Other isolates were affiliated with genera such as Sphingomonas or Flavobacterium, which include strains that are capable of degrading cyanobacterial toxins or other recalcitrant and problematic organic compounds. The isolated strains provide a large group of bacteria that could be used in assessing and controlling the harmful effects of cyanobacteria.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Harke, M. J., Steffen, M. M., Gobler, C. J., Otten, T. G., Wilhelm, S. W., Wood, S. A., & Paerl, H. W. (2016) · Harmful Algae · doi:10.1016/j.hal.2015.12.007 · Cited by 1,084
An Update on the Genus Aeromonas: Taxonomy, Epidemiology, and Pathogenicity
Fernández-Bravo, A., & Figueras, M. J. (2020) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms8010129 · Cited by 699
Cyanobactins—ribosomal cyclic peptides produced by cyanobacteria
Sivonen, K., Leikoski, N., Fewer, D. P., & Jokela, J. (2010) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-010-2482-x · Cited by 275
Self-citationHarnessing the potential: Advances in cyanobacterial natural product research and biotechnology
Baunach, M., Guljamow, A., Miguel-Gordo, M., & Dittmann, E. (2024) · Natural Product Reports · doi:10.1039/d3np00045a · Cited by 66
Zevin, A. S., Rittmann, B. E., & Krajmalnik-Brown, R. (2016) · Algal Research · doi:10.1016/j.algal.2015.11.017 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Berg, K. A., Lyra, C., Sivonen, K., Paulin, L., Suomalainen, S., Tuomi, P., & Rapala, J.
- Venue
- The ISME Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-11-20
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 314-325
- ISSN
- 1751-7362 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-7370
- OpenAlex
- W2070214912
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High diversity of cultivable heterotrophic bacteria in association with cyanobacterial water blooms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ismej.2008.110
- The paper
- Berg, K. A., Lyra, C., Sivonen, K., Paulin, L., Suomalainen, S., Tuomi, P., & Rapala, J. (2009). High diversity of cultivable heterotrophic bacteria in association with cyanobacterial water blooms. The ISME Journal. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2008.110
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.