The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prophages in marine bacteria: dangerous molecular time bombs or the key to survival in the seas?
Abstract
Bacteriophages are realized to be numerous and important components of oceanic food webs principally because of their lytic capabilities. The subtle changes that temperate phages impart to their hosts in the oceans are far less understood. Occurrences of lysogeny in the oceans correlate well with conditions unfavorable for rapid host growth. In coliphage λ, phage encoded repressors have been shown to modulate host metabolic gene expression and phenotype, resulting in economizing host energy expenditure. Comparison of lysogenized marine bacteria to the uninfected hosts indicated that prophage acquisition is correlated with host metabolic gene suppression. Screening 113 marine bacterial genomes for prophages yielded 64 prophage-like elements, 21 of which strongly resembled gene transfer agents (GTAs). The remaining 39 putative prophages had a relatively high incidence of transcriptional regulatory and repressor-like proteins (∼2/40 kb prophage sequence) compared to lytic marine phages (∼0.25/40 kb phage sequence). Here, it has been hypothesized that marine prophages directly contribute to host survival in unfavorable environments by suppression of unneeded metabolic activities. It has been further suggested that such metabolic downshifts are the result of phage-encoded repressors and transcriptional regulators acting directly on host genes. Finally, the widespread occurrence of GTAs may be an efficient mechanism for horizontal gene transfer in the oceans.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Lysogeny in nature: mechanisms, impact and ecology of temperate phages
Howard-Varona, C., Hargreaves, K. R., Abedon, S. T., & Sullivan, M. B. (2017) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2017.16 · Cited by 894
Should we stay or should we go: mechanisms and ecological consequences for biofilm dispersal
McDougald, D., Rice, S. A., Barraud, N., Steinberg, P. D., & Kjelleberg, S. (2012) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2695 · Cited by 881
Breitbart, M. (2012) · Annual Review of Marine Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-marine-120709-142805 · Cited by 607
Gene transfer agents: phage-like elements of genetic exchange
Lang, A. S., Zhaxybayeva, O., & Beatty, J. T. (2012) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2802 · Cited by 416
New dimensions of the virus world discovered through metagenomics
Kristensen, D. M., Mushegian, A. R., Dolja, V. V., & Koonin, E. V. (2010) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2009.11.003 · Cited by 332
Metadata
- Authors
- Paul, J. H.
- Venue
- The ISME Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-06
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 579-589
- ISSN
- 1751-7362 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-7370
- OpenAlex
- W2048122831
- Cited by
- 452
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prophages in marine bacteria: dangerous molecular time bombs or the key to survival in the seas? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ismej.2008.35
- The paper
- Paul, J. H. (2008). Prophages in marine bacteria: dangerous molecular time bombs or the key to survival in the seas? The ISME Journal. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2008.35
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.