The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Identification of iron-reducing microorganisms in anoxic rice paddy soil by 13C-acetate probing
Abstract
In anoxic rice field soil, ferric iron reduction is one of the most important terminal electron accepting processes, yet little is known about the identity of iron-reducing microorganisms. Here, we identified acetate-metabolizing bacteria by RNA-based stable isotope probing in the presence of iron(III) oxides as electron acceptors. After reduction of endogenous iron(III) for 21 days, isotope probing with 13C-labeled acetate (2 mm) and added ferric iron oxides (ferrihydrite or goethite) was performed in rice field soil slurries for 48 and 72 h. Ferrihydrite reduction coincided with a strong suppression of methanogenesis (77%). Extracted RNA from each treatment was density resolved by isopycnic centrifugation, and analyzed by terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism, followed by cloning and sequencing of 16S rRNA of bacterial and archaeal populations. In heavy, isotopically labeled RNAs of the ferrihydrite treatment, predominant 13C-assimilating populations were identified as Geobacter spp. (∼85% of all clones). In the goethite treatment, iron(II) formation was not detectable. However, Geobacter spp. (∼30%), the δ-proteobacterial Anaeromyxobacter spp. (∼30%), and novel β-Proteobacteria were predominant in heavy rRNA fractions indicating that 13C-acetate had been assimilated in the presence of goethite, whereas none were detected in the control heavy RNA. For the first time, active acetate-oxidizing iron(III)-reducing bacteria, including novel hitherto unrecognized populations, were identified as a functional guild in anoxic paddy soil.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lovley, D. R., & Phillips, E. J. P. (1988) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.54.6.1472-1480.1988 · Cited by 2,395
Humic substances as electron acceptors for microbial respiration
Lovley, D. R., Coates, J. D., Blunt-Harris, E. L., Phillips, E. J. P., & Woodward, J. C. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/382445a0 · Cited by 1,834
Dissimilatory Fe(III) and Mn(IV) Reduction
Lovley, D. R., Holmes, D. E., & Nevin, K. P. (2004) · Advances in Microbial Physiology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2911(04)49005-5 · Cited by 1,471
Cited by
Methane Production and Conductive Materials: A Critical Review
Martins, G., Salvador, A. F., Pereira, L., & Alves, M. M. (2018) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.8b01913 · Cited by 432
Sulfate-reducing microorganisms in wetlands – fameless actors in carbon cycling and climate change
Pester, M. (2012) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2012.00072 · Cited by 384
Wan, L., Liu, H., & Wang, X. (2022) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151687 · Cited by 92
Bray, M. S., Wu, J., Reed, B. C., Kretz, C. B., Belli, K. M., Simister, R. L., Henny, C., Stewart, F. J., DiChristina, T. J., Brandes, J. A., et al. (2017) · Geobiology · doi:10.1111/gbi.12239 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Hori, T., Müller, A., Igarashi, Y., Conrad, R., & Friedrich, M. W.
- Venue
- The ISME Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-09-24
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 267-278
- ISSN
- 1751-7362 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-7370
- OpenAlex
- W2061443377
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identification of iron-reducing microorganisms in anoxic rice paddy soil by 13C-acetate probing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ismej.2009.100
- The paper
- Hori, T., Müller, A., Igarashi, Y., Conrad, R., & Friedrich, M. W. (2010). Identification of iron-reducing microorganisms in anoxic rice paddy soil by 13C-acetate probing. The ISME Journal. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2009.100
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.