The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Composition, uniqueness and variability of the epiphytic bacterial community of the green alga Ulva australis
Open accessAbstract
Green Ulvacean marine macroalgae are distributed worldwide in coastal tidal and subtidal ecosystems. As for many living surfaces in the marine environment, little is known concerning the epiphytic bacterial biofilm communities that inhabit algal surfaces. This study reports on the largest published libraries of near full-length 16S rRNA genes from a marine algal surface (5293 sequences from six samples) allowing for an in-depth assessment of the diversity and phylogenetic profile of the bacterial community on a green Ulvacean alga. Large 16S rRNA gene libraries of surrounding seawater were also used to determine the uniqueness of this bacterial community. The surface of Ulva australis is dominated by sequences of Alphaproteobacteria and the Bacteroidetes, especially within the Rhodobacteriaceae, Sphingomonadaceae, Flavobacteriaceae and Sapropiraceae families. Seawater libraries were also dominated by Alphaproteobacteria and Bacteroidetes sequences, but were shown to be clearly distinct from U. australis libraries through the clustering of sequences into operational taxonomic units and Bray–Curtis similarity analysis. Almost no similarity was observed between these two environments at the species level, and only minor similarity was observed at levels of sequence clustering representing clades of bacteria within family and genus taxonomic groups. Variability between libraries of U. australis was relatively high, and a consistent sub-population of bacterial species was not detected. The competitive lottery model, originally derived to explain diversity in coral reef fishes, may explain the pattern of colonization of this algal surface.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing
MetaHIT Consortium, Qin, J., Li, R., Raes, J., Arumugam, M., Burgdorf, K. S., Manichanh, C., Nielsen, T., Pons, N., Levenez, F., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08821 · Cited by 11,624
The contribution of species richness and composition to bacterial services
Bell, T., Newman, J. A., Silverman, B. W., Turner, S. L., & Lilley, A. K. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03891 · Cited by 950
Wilson, K., Able, K., & Heck, K. (1989) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps058243 · Cited by 134
Cited by
Bacterial community assembly based on functional genes rather than species
Burke, C., Steinberg, P., Rusch, D., Kjelleberg, S., & Thomas, T. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1101591108 · Cited by 852
Self-citationMicrobes Drive Evolution of Animals and Plants: the Hologenome Concept
Rosenberg, E., & Zilber-Rosenberg, I. (2016) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.01395-15 · Cited by 499
Marine biofilms on artificial surfaces: structure and dynamics
Salta, M., Wharton, J. A., Blache, Y., Stokes, K. R., & Briand, J. (2013) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/1462-2920.12186 · Cited by 473
Changes in assembly processes in soil bacterial communities following a wildfire disturbance
Ferrenberg, S., O’Neill, S. P., Knelman, J. E., Todd, B., Duggan, S., Bradley, D., Robinson, T., Schmidt, S. K., Townsend, A. R., Williams, M. W., et al. (2013) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2013.11 · Cited by 445
Origin and evolution of the plant immune system
Han, G. (2019) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.15596 · Cited by 282
Metadata
- Authors
- Burke, C., Thomas, T., Lewis, M., Steinberg, P., & Kjelleberg, S.
- Venue
- The ISME Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-11-04
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 590-600
- ISSN
- 1751-7362 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-7370
- OpenAlex
- W2113378924
- Cited by
- 378
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 13.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Composition, uniqueness and variability of the epiphytic bacterial community of the green alga Ulva australis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ismej.2010.164
- The paper
- Burke, C., Thomas, T., Lewis, M., Steinberg, P., & Kjelleberg, S. (2011). Composition, uniqueness and variability of the epiphytic bacterial community of the green alga Ulva australis. The ISME Journal. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2010.164
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.