The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reproducibility and quantitation of amplicon sequencing-based detection
Open accessAbstract
To determine the reproducibility and quantitation of the amplicon sequencing-based detection approach for analyzing microbial community structure, a total of 24 microbial communities from a long-term global change experimental site were examined. Genomic DNA obtained from each community was used to amplify 16S rRNA genes with two or three barcode tags as technical replicates in the presence of a small quantity (0.1% wt/wt) of genomic DNA from Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 as the control. The technical reproducibility of the amplicon sequencing-based detection approach is quite low, with an average operational taxonomic unit (OTU) overlap of 17.2%±2.3% between two technical replicates, and 8.2%±2.3% among three technical replicates, which is most likely due to problems associated with random sampling processes. Such variations in technical replicates could have substantial effects on estimating β-diversity but less on α-diversity. A high variation was also observed in the control across different samples (for example, 66.7-fold for the forward primer), suggesting that the amplicon sequencing-based detection approach could not be quantitative. In addition, various strategies were examined to improve the comparability of amplicon sequencing data, such as increasing biological replicates, and removing singleton sequences and less-representative OTUs across biological replicates. Finally, as expected, various statistical analyses with preprocessed experimental data revealed clear differences in the composition and structure of microbial communities between warming and non-warming, or between clipping and non-clipping. Taken together, these results suggest that amplicon sequencing-based detection is useful in analyzing microbial community structure even though it is not reproducible and quantitative. However, great caution should be taken in experimental design and data interpretation when the amplicon sequencing-based detection approach is used for quantitative analysis of the β-diversity of microbial communities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance
Anderson, M. J. (2001) · Austral Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2001.01070.pp.x · Cited by 13,828
Archaea predominate among ammonia-oxidizing prokaryotes in soils
Leininger, S., Urich, T., Schloter, M., Schwark, L., Qi, J., Nicol, G. W., Prosser, J. I., Schuster, S. C., & Schleper, C. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04983 · Cited by 2,497
Ironing out the wrinkles in the rare biosphere through improved OTU clustering
Huse, S. M., Welch, D. M., Morrison, H. G., & Sogin, M. L. (2010) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02193.x · Cited by 1,346
Daniel, R. (2005) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1160 · Cited by 862
Cited by
Changes in cystic fibrosis airway microbiota at pulmonary exacerbation
Carmody, L. A., Zhao, J., Schloss, P. D., Petrosino, J. F., Murray, S., Young, V. B., Li, J. Z., & LiPuma, J. J. (2013) · Annals of the American Thoracic Society · doi:10.1513/annalsats.201211-107oc · Cited by 239
Loss of soil microbial diversity exacerbates spread of antibiotic resistance
Chen, Q.-L., An, X.-L., Zheng, B.-X., Gillings, M., Peñuelas, J., Cui, L., Su, J.-Q., & Zhu, Y.-G. (2019) · Soil Ecology Letters · doi:10.1007/s42832-019-0011-0 · Cited by 131
Uyaguari-Diaz, M. I., Chan, M., Chaban, B. L., Croxen, M. A., Finke, J. F., Hill, J. E., Peabody, M. A., Van Rossum, T., Suttle, C. A., Brinkman, F. S. L., et al. (2016) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-016-0166-1 · Cited by 104
Parente, E., Cocolin, L., De Filippis, F., Zotta, T., Ferrocino, I., O'Sullivan, O., Neviani, E., De Angelis, M., Cotter, P. D., & Ercolini, D. (2016) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.12.001 · Cited by 82
Liao, H., Li, Y., & Yao, H. (2019) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2019.01361 · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhou, J., Wu, L., Deng, Y., Zhi, X., Jiang, Y.-H., Tu, Q., Xie, J., Van Nostrand, J. D., He, Z., & Yang, Y.
- Venue
- The ISME Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-02-24
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1303-1313
- ISSN
- 1751-7362 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-7370
- OpenAlex
- W2114859967
- Cited by
- 437
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 29.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.