Cited by 83Probiotics and Fermented FoodsGut microbiota and healthMicrobial Community Ecology and Physiology

FoodMicrobionet: A Database for the Visualisation and Exploration of Food Bacterial Communities Based on Network Analysis

Open access
Parente, Eugenio, Cocolin, Luca, De Filippis, Francesca, Zotta, Teresa, Ferrocino, Ilario, O'Sullivan, Orla, Neviani, Erasmo, De Angelis, Maria +2 more·2016·International Journal of Food Microbiology

Abstract

Amplicon targeted high-throughput sequencing has become a popular tool for the culture-independent analysis of microbial communities. Although the data obtained with this approach are portable and the number of sequences available in public databases is increasing, no tool has been developed yet for the analysis and presentation of data obtained in different studies. This work describes an approach for the development of a database for the rapid exploration and analysis of data on food microbial communities. Data from seventeen studies investigating the structure of bacterial communities in dairy, meat, sourdough and fermented vegetable products, obtained by 16S rRNA gene targeted high-throughput sequencing, were collated and analysed using Gephi, a network analysis software. The resulting database, which we named FoodMicrobionet, was used to analyse nodes and network properties and to build an interactive web-based visualisation. The latter allows the visual exploration of the relationships between Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) and samples and the identification of core- and sample-specific bacterial communities. It also provides additional search tools and hyperlinks for the rapid selection of food groups and OTUs and for rapid access to external resources (NCBI taxonomy, digital versions of the original articles). Microbial interaction network analysis was carried out using CoNet on datasets extracted from FoodMicrobionet: the complexity of interaction networks was much lower than that found for other bacterial communities (human microbiome, soil and other environments). This may reflect both a bias in the dataset (which was dominated by fermented foods and starter cultures) and the lower complexity of food bacterial communities. Although some technical challenges exist, and are discussed here, the net result is a valuable tool for the exploration of food bacterial communities by the scientific community and food industry.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.12.001

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Specific cheese microbes or consortia are adapted to various abiotic stresses, including changes in pH, salinity, temperature, and moisture, as well as biotic stresses like competition and invasion resistance, both at the individual and community levels.

    “Specific cheese microbes or consortia are adapted to various abiotic stresses, including changes in pH, salinity, temperature, and moisture, as well as biotic stresses like competition and invasion resistance, both at the individual and community levels [46,53,59,61,65,71,73,75,76,77,78].”

    From Microbiota of Cheese Ecosystems: A Perspective on Cheesemaking (2025) · cites this paper as [76]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The whey left after manufacturing has a unique temperature, chemical composition, and microflora, varying by species and biotypes depending on the chosen technology and type of milk.

    “The whey left after manufacturing has a unique temperature, chemical composition, and microflora, varying by species and biotypes depending on the chosen technology and type of milk [21,59,73,76,80,109,110,111,112].”

    From Microbiota of Cheese Ecosystems: A Perspective on Cheesemaking (2025) · cites this paper as [76]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says that food microbiota can reflect the raw material and processing conditions. It does not address whey left after manufacturing or establish that its temperature, chemical composition, and microbial species or biotypes vary with the technology and type of milk. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Mendes, L. W., Kuramae, E. E, Navarrete, A. A., van Veen, J. A., Tsai, S. M., 2014. Taxonomical and functional microbial community selection in soybean rhizosphere. ISME Journal 8, 1577-1587.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parente, E., Cocolin, L., De Filippis, F., Zotta, T., Ferrocino, I., O'Sullivan, O., Neviani, E., De Angelis, M., Cotter, P. D., & Ercolini, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Basilicata (IT)
  • University of Turin (IT)
  • Institute of Food Science (IT)
  • University of Parma (IT)
  • Teagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority (IE)
  • University of Naples Federico II (IT)
Corresponding author
Parente, Eugenio
Venue
International Journal of Food Microbiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-02
Volume
219
Pages
28-37
ISSN
0168-1605 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2192338192
Cited by
82
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4
FWCI
8.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Food Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Basilicata) (submittedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Bari Aldo Moro) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
Keywords
network analysis, 16S rRNA gene sequencing, microbial interaction networks, fermented foods, dairy products, meat products, sourdough, fermented vegetables, starter cultures, core microbiome, web-based visualization
MeSH terms
Vegetable Products, Animals, DNA, Bacterial, Food Microbiology, Foodborne Diseases, Humans, Meat, Milk, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Sensitivity and Specificity, Software, DNA Primers, Databases, Genetic, Limit of Detection, Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review