The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genetic and functional properties of uncultivated MCG archaea assessed by metagenome and gene expression analyses
Open accessAbstract
The Miscellaneous Crenarchaeota group (MCG) Archaea is one of the predominant archaeal groups in anoxic environments and may have significant roles in the global biogeochemical cycles. However, no isolate of MCG has been cultivated or characterized to date. In this study, we investigated the genetic organization, ecophysiological properties and evolutionary relationships of MCG archaea with other archaeal members using metagenome information and the result of gene expression experiments. A comparison of the gene organizations and similarities around the 16S rRNA genes from all available MCG fosmid and cosmid clones revealed no significant synteny among genomic fragments, demonstrating that there are large genetic variations within members of the MCG. Phylogenetic analyses of large-subunit+small-subunit rRNA, concatenated ribosomal protein genes and topoisomerases IB gene (TopoIB) all demonstrate that MCG constituted a sister lineage to the newly proposed archaeal phylum Aigarchaeota and Thaumarchaeota. Genes involved in protocatechuate degradation and chemotaxis were found in a MCG fosmid 75G8 genome fragment, suggesting that this MCG member may have a role in the degradation of aromatic compounds. Moreover, the expression of a putative 4-carboxymuconolactone decarboxylase was observed when the sediment was supplemented with protocatechuate, further supporting the hypothesis that this MCG member degrades aromatic compounds.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SignalP 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions
Petersen, T. N., Brunak, S., von Heijne, G., & Nielsen, H. (2011) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1701 · Cited by 8,847
Cited by
Castelle, C. J., Wrighton, K. C., Thomas, B. C., Hug, L. A., Brown, C. T., Wilkins, M. J., Frischkorn, K. R., Tringe, S. G., Singh, A., Markillie, L. M., et al. (2015) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2015.01.014 · Cited by 536
A standardized archaeal taxonomy for the Genome Taxonomy Database
Rinke, C., Chuvochina, M., Mussig, A. J., Chaumeil, P.-A., Davín, A. A., Waite, D. W., Whitman, W. B., Parks, D. H., & Hugenholtz, P. (2021) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41564-021-00918-8 · Cited by 485
Genomic exploration of the diversity, ecology, and evolution of the archaeal domain of life
Spang, A., Caceres, E. F., & Ettema, T. J. G. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaf3883 · Cited by 346
He, Y., Li, M., Perumal, V., Feng, X., Fang, J., Xie, J., Sievert, S. M., & Wang, F. (2016) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.35 · Cited by 346
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Meng, J., Xu, J., Qin, D., He, Y., Xiao, X., & Wang, F.
- Venue
- The ISME Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-10-10
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 650-659
- ISSN
- 1751-7362 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-7370
- OpenAlex
- W2025870583
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genetic and functional properties of uncultivated MCG archaea assessed by metagenome and gene expression analyses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ismej.2013.174
- The paper
- Meng, J., Xu, J., Qin, D., He, Y., Xiao, X., & Wang, F. (2014). Genetic and functional properties of uncultivated MCG archaea assessed by metagenome and gene expression analyses. The ISME Journal. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2013.174
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.